Corporate social responsibility developments in post-communist countries: Towards organisations’ social legitimacy


  • Kaja Tampere Tallinn University



CSR, social legitimacy, business and society, management, post-comunist countries


The aim of the paper is to introduce corporate social responsibility CSR as an organisation’s management and stakeholders’ relations tool in post-communist countries for ensuring the organisation’s social legitimacy. The article discusses how understanding the interdependence between the organisation and society helps to support the organisation to develop social legitimacy and therefore ensure its sustainability. The general research problem in this article is connected with the societal context of studied organisations: how CSR could be positioned and managed in a post-communist society to avoid a rebuff against an organisation’s CSR activities. The topic of this paper is approached through three research questions: how post-communist organisations see the CSR position in the organisation, how social legitimacy is acknowledged and defined, and finally to what extent CSR is seen as a tool for ensuring social legitimacy. For the research, seven Estonian organisations’ representatives with management responsibility were interviewed to find out their thoughts and ideas about CSR and social legitimacy.

Author Biography

Kaja Tampere, Tallinn University

Kaja Tampere, PhD, is a professor of public relations and communication. She is currently working at the Tartu Health Care College. Her research is concerned with innovations in social and corporate communication, and with the ways that stakeholders enter into communication policy, as well as science and health communication. She is the author of numerous journal articles and book chapters


Brusseau, J. (2011). The Responsible Office: Corporations and Social Responsibility: The Business Ethics Textbook. Retrieved October 12, 2017 from

Castello, I., & Lozano, J. M. (2011). Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate responsibility rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), pp. 11–29.

Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimizing effect of social and environmental disclosures — a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), pp. 282–311.

Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18, pp. 122–136.

Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine.

Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8, pp. 47–77.

Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing Public Relations. New York, NY: CBS College Publishing.

Holmström, S. (2005). Co-evolution of society and organization: Reflexivity, contingency and reflec-tion. Organizational Legitimacy and the Public Sphere, 1, pp. 54–72.

Ihlen, O., Bartlett, J., & May, S. (2011). The Handbook of Communication and Corporate Social Responsibility. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In: W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 41–62.

Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Retrieved April 3, 2014 from

Parsons, T. (1961). Structure and process in modern societies. American Journal of Sociology, 66(6), pp. 616–617.

Pfeffer, J. (1981). Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organisational paradigms. In: B. S. L. Cummings (ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 3. Greenwich: CT JAI Press, pp. 1–52.

Pirsch, J., Gupta, S., & Grau, S. L. (2007). A framework for understanding corporate social responsibility programs as a continuum: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, pp. 125–140.

Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 17(3), pp. 58–64.

Sethi, S. P. (2002). Standards for corporate conduct in the international arena: Challenges and opportunities for multinational corporations. Business and Society Review, 107(1), pp. 20–40.

Shocker, A. D., & Sethi, S. P. (1973). An approach to incorporating social preferences in developing action strategies. California Management Review, Summer, pp. 97–105.

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), pp. 577–585. Retrieved December 29, 2013 from

Tampere, K. (2013). The scope and limit for the development of social responsibility in the Baltic States as a strategy of corporate communication. Central European Journal of Communication, 6, pp. 293–307.

Ward, L. (2006). Legitimacy theory: A story of reporting social and environmental matter within the Australian food and beverage industry. Retrieved October 12, 2017 from




How to Cite

Tampere, K. (2019). Corporate social responsibility developments in post-communist countries: Towards organisations’ social legitimacy . Central European Journal of Communication, 12(1(22), 62-77.



Scientific Papers