The The Mass Media’s Systemic Contribution to Political Transformation

Coverage of the 1956 Uprising in Hungarian Print Media (June 1988–June 1989)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.14.2(29).6

Keywords:

Mass Media Systems, Print Media Reporting, Political transformation, public sphere, transformation of discourse, Hungary, Imre Nagy

Abstract

The article is aimed at contributing to the discussion of the role of the mass media system in political transformation. For this purpose, reporting on a political issue relevant to the transformation was selected for tracing the theoretical assumption along empirical results: the hitherto taboo topic of Hungarian uprising in 1956. I studied how 1956 was reported in Hungary’s main print media, Népszabadság and Magyar Nemzet, from June 1988 to June 1989. These newspapers, despite still being controlled by the government in the dissolving socialist system of the end 1980s, helped a functional public sphere emerging. The newspapers broadened the interpretive scope by facilitating dissenting opinions and enabled a hitherto suppressed discourse about Kadar’s role in the historical events of 1956. The results suggest the newspapers acted as professional mediators and had a systemic stabilising effect on Hungarian society in this smouldering conflict.

Author Biography

Indira Dupuis, Freie Universität Berlin

Indira Dupuis, PhD, is post-doc researcher affiliated at the institute for media and communication studies at Free University of Berlin. Her main research interests are political public discourse, mass media systems and journalism especially in Eastern Europe, and mass media functionality in political processes.

References

Asen, R. (2000). Seeking the „Counter” in Counterpublics. Communication Theory, 10(4), 424–446.

Aumente, J. (ed.) (1999). Eastern European journalism. Before, during and after communism. Hampton, Cresskill, NJ.

Bajomi-Lázár, P. (1999). Press Freedom in Hungary, 1988–1998. Budapest: OSI-IPF Draft Working Papers. http://www.osi.hu/ipf/pubs.html

Bajomi-Lázár, P. & Kékesdi-Boldog, D. (2018). Zurück in die Zukunft: Autoritäre Medienpolitik in Ungarn [Back to the Future: Authoritarian Media Policy in Hungary]. Osteuropa, 3–5, 273–282.

Blöbaum, B. (1994). Journalismus als soziales System: Geschichte, Ausdifferenzierung und Verselbständigung [Journalism as a social system: history, differentiation and independence]. Westdeutscher Verlag.

Bozóki, A. (ed) (2002). The Roundtable Talks of 1989: The genesis of Hungarian democracy analysis and documents. Central European University Press.

Dupuis, I. (2012). Transnationalisierung der Öffentlichkeit in Mittelosteuropa. Eine Befragung von Journalisten zur EU-Berichterstattung [Transnationalization of the public sphere in Central Eastern Europe. A survey of journalists on the EU-reporting]. Nomos.

Dupuis, I. (2020). The de-legitimization of general Jaruzelski’s government by official mass media, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 53(2), 93–112.

Fehr, H. (1977). Soziale Kontinuität und sozialer Wandel [Social continuity and social change]. Campus Verlag.

Fowkes, B. (1995). Rise and fall of communism in Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.

Gálik, M. & James, B. (1999). Ownership and control of the Hungarian press. Javnost – The Public, 6(2), 75–91.

Gerhards, J. (2002). Öffentlichkeit [The public]. In I. Neverla, E. Grittmann & M. Pater (Eds.) (2002). Grundlagentexte zur Journalistik [Basic texts for journalism] (pp. 128–138). UVK Verl.-Gesellschaft.

Goban-Klas, T. (1997). Stalinism and the press. Soviet patterns and Polish variations. In E. Mühle (ed.) Vom Instrument der Partei zur „Vierten Gewalt”: Die ostmitteleuropäische Presse als zeithistorische Quelle [From the instrument of the party to the “fourth estate”: The East Central European press as a historical source] (pp.13–14). Herder-Institut.

Goldman, M. F. (1997). Revolution and change in Central and Eastern Europe: Political, economic, and social challenges. M.E. Sharpe.

Gorbačev, M. (Ed.) (1990). Glasnost: Das neue Denken [Glasnost: The new way of thinking]. Ullstein.

Gyáni, G. (2006). Memory and discourse on the 1956 Hungarian revolution. Europe-Asia Studies, 58(8), 1199–1208.

Havliček, D. and Kende, P. (1985). Die öffentliche Information in den sowjetischen politischen Systemen: Zensur in Ungarn [Public information in Soviet political systems: Censorship in Hungary]. Verlag: Index e.V.

Holl, M.-K. (2003). Semantik und soziales Gedächtnis: Die Systemtheorie Niklas Luhmanns und die Gedächtnistheorie von Aleida und Jan Assmann [Semantics and social memory: Niklas Luhmann’s systems theory and Aleida and Jan Assmann’s memory theory]. Königshausen & Neumann.

Huxable, S. (2018). Making News Soviet: Rethinking Journalistic Professionalism after Stalin, 1953–1970. Contemporary European History, 27(1), 59–84.

Imhof, K. (2002). Integration und Medien [Integration and media]. Westdeutscher Verlag.

Jarren, O. & Steininger, Ch. (2016). Journalismus jenseits von Markt und Staat, Institutionentheoretische Ansätze und Konzepte in der Publizistik – und Kommunikationswissenschaft [Journalism beyond market and state, institutional theoretical approaches and concepts in journalism – and communication studies]. Nomos.

Klein, J. (2016). Politische Semantik/semantische Kämpfe [Political semantics/semantic struggles]. In L. Jäger, et al. (Eds.) (2016). Sprache – Kultur – Kommunikation / Language – Culture – Communication (pp. 607–616). De Gruyter.

Klein, J. (Ed.) (1989). Politische Semantik: Bedeutungsanalytische und sprachkritische Beiträge zur politischen Sprachverwendung [Political semantics: meaning-analytic and language-critical contributions to political language use]. Westdeutscher Verlag.

Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative text analysis: A guide to methods, practice & using software. Sage.

Luhmann, N. (1973). Institutionalisierung – Funktion und Mechanismus im sozialen System der Gesellschaft [Institutionalization – function and mechanism in the social system of society]. In H. Schelsky (Ed.) Zur Theorie der Institution [On the theory of the institution] (pp. 27–42). Bertelsmann Universitätsverlag.

Luhmann, N. (2000). The reality of the mass media. Stanford University Press.

Luhmann, N. (1987). Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie [Social systems. Outline of a general theory]. Suhrkamp.

Luhmann, N. & Hellmann, K.-U. (Eds.) (2004). Protest. Systemtheorie und soziale Bewegungen [Protest. Systems theory and social movements]. Suhrkamp.

Merkel, W. (Ed.) (1996). Systemwechsel 1. Theorien, Ansätze und Konzepte der Transitionsforschung [System change 1. Theories, approaches and concepts of transition research]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Merkel, W. (2010). Systemtransformation. Eine Einführung in die Theorie und Empirie der Transformationsforschung [System Transformation. An introduction to the theory and empirics of transformation research]. VS Verl. für Sozialwissenschaften.

Mommsen, M. (1989). Glasnost in der UdSSR. Von systemimmanenter „Kritik und Selbstkritik” zum systemüberwindenden Offentlichen Diskurs [Glasnost in the USSR. From system-immanent “criticism and self-criticism” to system-transcending public discourse]. In: R. Rytlewski (Ed.), Politik und Gesellschaft in sozialistischen Ländern [Politics and society in socialist countries]. VS Verl. für Sozialwissenschaften.

Nagy, E. (1987). Temetetlen Holtak [The unburied dead]. Beszélő (3). Retrieved from http://beszelo.c3.hu/cikkek/temetetlen-holtak.

Nyyssönen, H. (1999). The presence of the past in politics: 1956 after 1956 in Hungary. University of Jyväskylä.

Nyyssönen, H. (2003). Rememberance and oblivion: 1956 and the politics of memory in Hungary. In G.T. Rittersporn (Ed.) (2003). Sphären von Öffentlichkeit in Gesellschaften sowjetischen Typs: Zwischen parteistaatlicher Selbstinszenierung und kirchlichen Gegenwelten [Spheres of the public sphere in Soviet-type societies: Between party-state self-staging and Church counterworlds]. Public spheres in Soviet type societies (pp. 335–355). Lang.

O’Neil, P. H. (Ed.) (1997). Post-communism and the media in Eastern Europe. Cass.

Rainer, J. M. (2002). Regime change and the Tradition of 1956. In A. Bozóki A (Ed.) The Roundtable Talks of 1989: The genesis of Hungarian democracy analysis and documents (pp. 211–222). Central European University Press.

Scholl, A. (1997). Autonomie und Informationsverhalten im Journalismus [Autonomy and information behavior in journalism]. In G. Bentele (Ed.) (1997). Aktuelle Entstehung von Öffentlichkeit: Akteure – Strukturen – Veränderungen [Current emergence of the public sphere: actors – structures – changes](pp. 127–139). UVK-Medien.

Szilágyi, A. & Bozóki, A. (2015). Playing it again in post-communism: The revolutionary rhetoric of Viktor Orbán in Hungary. Advances in the History of Rhetoric, 18 (sup1), 153–166.

Takács, R. (2012). Politikai újságírás a Kádár-korban [Political journalism in the Kádár era]. Napvilág.

Thomaß, B. (2015). Massenmedien [Mass media]. In R. Kollmorgen, W. Merkel, & H.-J. Wagener (Eds.) Handbuch Transformationsforschung [Handbook of Transformation Research] (pp. 617–623). Springer Fachmedien.

Thomaß, B. & Tzankoff, M. (Eds.) (2001). Medien und Transformation in Osteuropa [Media and transformation in Eastern Europe]. Westdeutscher Verlag; Springer Fachmedien.

Tőkés, R. L. (1996). Hungary’s negotiated revolution: Economic reform, social change, and political succession, 1957 – 1990. Cambridge University Press.

Verschraegen, G. (2002). Human rights and modern society: A sociological analysis from the perspective of systems theory. Journal of Law and Society, 29(2), 258–281.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-13

How to Cite

Dupuis, I. (2022). The The Mass Media’s Systemic Contribution to Political Transformation: Coverage of the 1956 Uprising in Hungarian Print Media (June 1988–June 1989). Central European Journal of Communication, 14(2(29), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.14.2(29).6

Issue

Section

Scientific Papers