Media populism in Macedonia: Right-wing populist style in the coverage of the “migrant crisis”

Authors

  • Ivo Bosilkov University of Amsterdam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19195/1899-5101.12.2(23).6

Keywords:

populism, migration, Macedonia, media, content analysis

Abstract

The communicative style used to exclude immigrants from the idea of “the people” is the scope through which right-wing media populism is measured in a case study of Macedonia, a post-communist country on the Balkan migrant route. Quantitative content analysis of articles from four Macedonian right-wing partisan news outlets N = 409, demonstrates a clear change in tone in coverage of migration, marked by an increase of populism as the “migrant crisis” intensified. Logistic regression confirms that  incivility, as a proxy for the intensity of partisan bias, is a significant predictor of populism, and opinion pieces have a significantly stronger populist tendency than news reports. The findings show that online news outlets, however, are not more populist than traditional print media.

Author Biography

Ivo Bosilkov, University of Amsterdam

Ivo Bosilkov is a PhD candidate in political studies at the Network for the Advancement of Social and Political Studies (NASP) at the University of Milan, and in political communication at the Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR) at the University of Amsterdam.

References

Akkerman, A., Mudde, C., & Zaslove, A. (2013). How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47(9), 1324–1353.

Allan, S. (2002). Reweaving the internet: Online news after September 11. In B. Zelitzer & S. Allan (Eds.), Journalism after September 11 (pp. 119–139). New York: Routledge.

Alvares, C., & Dahlgren, P. (2016). Populism, extremism and media: Mapping an uncertain terrain. European Journal Of Communication, 31(1), 46–57.

Barr, R. (2009). Populists, outsiders and anti-establishment politics. Party Politics, 15(1), 29–48.

Baum, M., & Groeling, T. (2008). New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Political Communication, 25(4), 345–365.

Belicanec, R., & Ricliev, Z. (2012). Mapping digital media: Macedonia. Open Society Media Program, 4–84. Retrieved from https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/uploads/960d8b50-c9e6-48b48745-ab68d682b5f9/mapping-digital-media-macedonia-20120625.pdf.

Bos, L., & Brants, K. (2014). Populist rhetoric in politics and media: A longitudinal study of the Netherlands. European Journal of Communication, 29(6), 703–719.

Bugaric, B. (2008). Populism, liberal democracy, and the rule of law in Central and Eastern Europe. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 41(2), 191–203.

Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16.

Causidis, T., & Sekulovski, D. (2013). Macedonia: “Critical media is vanishing”. Index on Censorship. Retrieved May 27, 2016, from https://www.indexoncensorship.org/2013/11/macedonia/.

Cvetanoski, I. (2015). Journalism in Macedonia: The awful truth. Osservatorio Balkani e Caucaso Trans- europa. Retrieved May 27, 2016, from https://www.balcanicaucaso.org/eng/Areas/Macedonia/Journalism-in-Macedonia-the-awful-truth-163490.

de Vreese, C., Esser, F., Aalberg, T., Reinemann, C., & Stanyer, J. (2018). Populism as an expression of political communication content and style: A new perspective. International Journal of Press/ Politics, 23(4), 1–16.

Djerf-Pierre, M., & Weibull, L. (2008). From public educator to interpreting ombudsman. In J. Stromback, M. Orsten, & T. Aalberg (Eds.), Communicating politics (pp. 195–214). Gothenburg: Nordicom.

Gervais, B. (2014). Following the news? Reception of uncivil partisan media and the use of incivility in political expression. Political Communication, 31(4), 564–583.

Gidron, N., & Bonikowski, B. (2013). Varieties of populism: Literature review and research agenda.

Working Paper Series, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, no. 130004. Retrieved December 2, 2018, from https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/gidron_bonikowski_populismlitreview_2013.pdf.

Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2012). Comparing media systems beyond the Western world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hameleers, M., Bos, L., & de Vreese, C. (2017). Shoot the messenger? The media’s role in framing populist attributions of blame. Journalism, online first, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917698170.

Hawkins, K. (2009). Is Chavez populist? Measuring Populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 42(8), 1040–1067.

Herbst, S. (2010). Rude democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

IREX (2015). Macedonia Media Sustainability Index 2015. Retrieved May 27, 2016, from https://www.irex.org/resource/macedonia-media-sustainability-index-msi.

Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345.

Jamieson, K., & Cappella, J. (2009). Echo chamber. New York: Oxford University Press.

Jamieson, K., & Hardy, B. (2012). What is civil engaged argument and why does aspiring to it matter? PS: Political Science & Politics, 45(3), 412–415.

Kazin, M. (1995). The populist persuasion: An American history. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Krämer, B. (2014). Media populism: A conceptual clarification and some theses on its effects. Communication Theory, 24(1), 42–60.

Levendusky, M. (2013). Why do partisan media polarize viewers? American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 611–623.

MacNamara, J. (2005). Media content analysis: Its uses, benefits and best practice methodology. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 6(1), 1–34.

Matheson, D. (2004). Weblogs and the epistemology of the news: Some trends in online journalism. New Media & Society, 6(4), 443–468.

Mazzoleni, G. (2008). Populism and the media. In D. Albertazzi & D. McDonnell (Eds.),Twenty-first century populism (pp. 49–67). New York: Palgrave.

Mazzoleni, G., Stewart, J., & Horsfield, B. (2003). The media and neo-populism. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.

Meny, Y., & Surel, Y. (2000). Par le peuple, pour le peuple. [Paris]: Fayard.

Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S. (2014). Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisation and political style. Political Studies, 62(2), 381–397.

Mudde, C. (2004). The populist Zeitgeist. Government & Opposition, 39(4), 542–563.

Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2011). Populism in Europe and the Americas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Norris, P. (1999). On message. London: SAGE.

Petkovski, L. (2014). Government’s PR: Who are Gruevski’s people? NVO Infocentar. Retrieved May 23, 2016, from http://nvoinfocentar.mk/en/pr-na-vladata-koj-e-narodot-na-gruevski/.

Reinemann, C., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Strömbäck, J., & de Vreese, C. (2016). Populist political communication: Towards a model of its causes, forms and effects. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, & C. de Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 12–29). London: Routledge.

Rooduijn, M. (2014). The mesmerising message: The diffusion of populism in public debates in Western European media. Political Studies, 62(4), 726–744.

Rydgren, J. (2005). Is extreme right-wing populism contagious? Explaining the emergence of a new party family. European Journal of Political Research, 44(3), 413–437.

Saura L., & Enli, G. S. (2011). Commercial television: Business in transition. In J. Trappel, W. A. Meier, L. d’Haenens, J. Steemers, & B. Thomass (Eds.), Media in Europe today (pp. 79–95). Bristol, UK: Intellect.

Singer, J. (2003). Who are these guys? The online challenge to the notion of journalistic professionalism. Journalism, 4(2), 139–163.

Smith, H., & Tran, M. (2016, February 29). Teargas fired as refugees try to breach Greek-Macedonian border. The Guardian. Retrieved May 23, 2016, from http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/29/teargas-fired-as-refugees-try-to-breach-greece-macedonia-border.

Sobieraj, S., & Berry, J. (2011). From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news. Political Communication, 28(1), 19–41.

Stroud, N. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576.

Sunstein, C. (2009). Going to extremes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Surmava, T. (2014). Macedonia: Elections and nationalism. Project for democratic union. Retrieved May 28, 2016, from http://www.democraticunion.eu/2014/05/macedonia-elections-and-nationalism/.

Taggart, P. (2000). Populism. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

Thorbjornsrud, K. (2015). Framing irregular immigration in Western media. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(7), 771–782.

Trappel, J., & Enli, G.S. (2011). Online media: Changing provision of news. In J. Trappel, W. A. Meier, L. d’Haenens, J. Steemers, & B. Thomass (Eds.), Media in Europe today (pp. 97–113). Bristol, UK: Intellect.

Van Dijk, T. (1988). News analysis. New Jersey: LEA.

Walgrave, S., & De Swert, K. (2007). Where does issue ownership come from? From the party or from the media? Issue-party identifications in Belgium, 1991–2005. The International Journal of Press/ Politics, 21(1), 37–67.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-23

How to Cite

Bosilkov, I. (2019). Media populism in Macedonia: Right-wing populist style in the coverage of the “migrant crisis” . Central European Journal of Communication, 12(2(23), 206-223. https://doi.org/10.19195/1899-5101.12.2(23).6