Media Capture Theory: A Paradigm Shift?

Authors

  • Péter Bajomi-Lázár Budapest Business University, Hungary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.17.2(36).567

Keywords:

media systems research, media capture, Central and Eastern Europe

Abstract

This paper consists of three parts. First, it suggests that a paradigm shift has taken place in political communication, as the advent of social media allows political elites to assert and frame their agendas in more efficient and economical ways than the capture of legacy media. In consequence, a paradigm shift is taking place in media studies as well: because traditional media capture theory does no longer fully account for contemporary media/politics interactions, media systems scholars now study the effects of disintermediation on media and political landscapes. Then this paper returns to traditional media capture theory and discusses some definitional issues. Finally, it recalls how party colonization of the media, a version of media capture theory, accounted for the deficit of media freedom in the former communist countries a decade ago.

Author Biography

Péter Bajomi-Lázár, Budapest Business University, Hungary

Péter Bajomi­‑Lázár is a Professor of Mass Communication at the Budapest Business University and the co-editor of the Hungarian media studies quarterly Médiakutató (The Media Researcher). His latest monograph in English is Party Colonisation of the Media in Central and Eastern Europe (Budapest & New York: The Central European University Press, 2014).
E-mail: bajomi-lazar.peter@uni-bge.hu

References

Bajomi­‑Lázár, P. (2014). Party Colonisation of the Media in Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest & New York: The Central European University Press.

Bajomi­‑Lázár, P. (2015). Variations in media freedom. Why some governments in Central and Eastern Europe respect media freedom more than others. Central European Journal of Communication, 8(14), 4–20.

Bajomi­‑Lázár, P., & Horváth, K. (2023). Two journalistic cultures in one country. The case of Hungary in the light of journalists’ discourses on fake news. Journalism Practice, published online 12 June, https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2223173

Balčytienė, A. (2013). A Conceptual Guide to the Analysis of Central and East European Transformations. In: I. T. Trivundža et al. (Eds.): Past, Future and Change: Contemporary Analysis of Evolving Media Scapes (pp. 29–39). Ljubljana: Slovene Communication Association & European Communication Research and Education Association.

Bátorfy, A., & Urbán, Á. (2019). State advertising as an instrument of transformation of the media market in Hungary. East European Politics, 36(1), 44–65.

Besley, T., & Prat, A. (2006). Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government Accountability. The American Economic Review, 96(3), 720–736.

Bradshaw, S., & Howard, P. N. (2019). The Global Disinformation Order: 2019 Global Inventory of Organised Social Media Manipulation, https://demtech.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/93/2019/09/CyberTroop­‑Report19.pdf-.

Corneo, G. (2005). Media Capture in Democracy: The Role of Wealth Concentration. CESIFO Working Paper 1402.

Dragomir, M. (2019). Media Capture in Europe. Center for Media, Data & Society, https://www.mdif.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/MDIF­‑Report-Media-Capture-in-Europe.pdf.

Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/Decoding. In: H. Stuart, H. Hobson, A. Lowe & P. Willis (Eds.): Culture, Media, Language. London: Hutchinson.

Hanula, Zs. (2022). Orban’s influencers shower cash, become largest social media spenders, telex.hu, 4 January, https://telex.hu/english/2022/01/04/orbans-influencers-shower-cash-become-largest-social-media-spenders.

IDEA [International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance] (2007). Political Parties in Central and Eastern Europe. In Search of Consolidation. Stockholm: International IDEA.

Jakubowicz, K. (2012). Post­‑Communist Political Systems and Media Freedom and Independence. In: J. Downey & S. Mihelj (Eds.): Central and Eastern European Media in Comparative Perspective. Politics, Economy and Culture (pp. 15–40). Farnham, UK & Burlington, US: Ashgate.

Katz, R. S., & Mair, P. (1995). Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy. The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics, 1(1), 5–28.

Kopecký, P., & Scherlis, G. (2008). Party Patronage in Contemporary Europe. European Review, 16(3), 355–371.

Kopecký, P. (2006). Political Parties and the State in Post­‑Communist Europe: The Nature of Symbiosis. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22(3), 251–273.

Mainwaring, S., & Torcal, M. (2005). Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory after the Third Wave of Democratization. Working Paper #319, http://kellogg.nd.edu/publications/workingpapers/WPS/319.pdf.

Mair, P., & van Biezen, I. (2001). Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies, 1980–2000. Party Politics, 7(1), 5–21.

Mancini, P. (2012). Instrumentalization of the media vs. political parallelism. Chinese Journal of Communication, 5(3), 262–280.

Morley, D. (1980). Television, Audiences and Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.

Mungiu­‑Pippidi, A. (2008). How Media and Politics Shape Each Other in the New Europe. In: K. Jakubowicz & M. Sükösd (Eds.): Finding the Right Place on the Map. Central and Eastern European Media Change in Global Perspective (pp. 87–101). Bristol, UK & Chicago, US: Intellect Books.

O’Dwyer, C. (2004). Runaway State Building. How Political Parties Shape States in Postcommunist Eastern Europe. World Politics, 56(4), 520–553.

Örnebring, H. (2012). Clientelism, Elites, and the Media in Central and Eastern Europe. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(4), 497–515.

Papathanassopoulos, S., & Negrine, R. (2019): Political communication, digital inequality and populism. In. J. Trappel (Ed.): Digital Media Inequalities (pp. 79–94). University of Gothenburg: Nordicom.

Petrova, M. (2005). Inequality and Media Capture, http://www.eea-esem.com/files/papers/EEA­‑ESEM/2006/1548/inequality_media_capture.pdf.

Reuters Institute (2021). Digital News Report 2021, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2021.

Reuters Institute (2022). Digital News Report 2022, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2022–06/Digital_News-Report_2022.pdf.

Seymour­‑Ure, C. (1974). The political impact of mass media. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Sparks, C. (2012). The Interplay of Politics and Economics in Transitional Societies. In: J. Downey & S. Mihelj (Eds.): Central and Eastern European Media in Comparative Perspective. Politics, Economy and Culture (pp. 41–61). Farnham, UK & Burlington, US: Ashgate.

Tófalvy, T. (2017). Online Harassment of Journalists in Hungary. Forms, Coping Mechanisms, and Consequences for Press Freedom. International Press Institute, 006_Hungary_Report_Ontheline_2017.pdf.

World Bank (2000). Anticorruption in Transition: Contribution to the Policy Debate. World Bank Publications. ISBN 9780821348024.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-06

How to Cite

Bajomi-Lázár, P. (2024). Media Capture Theory: A Paradigm Shift?. Central European Journal of Communication, 17(2(36), 238-246. https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.17.2(36).567