Doing Privacy

Exploring the Limits of Self-Determination

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.17.4(38).637

Keywords:

privacy, media practice, practice theory, activism, relational privacy

Abstract

Acknowledging the notoriously ‘incomplete’ nature of privacy has little effect on the considerable expectations the notion implies. Self-determined privacy points to reflexivity, critical practice and tech literacy. While privacy scholarship illustrates those points and explains how agents constantly fail in meeting these expectations, we ask the inverse question. What are the limits of privacy? Interviewing Polish and German activists who engage in privacy-conscious social and professional relations, this qualitative study strives to understand how self-determined privacy is realized. Focusing on how individuals shape their privacies as social agents, including the motivations and contexts of their practices, our insights serve as a case study highlighting the challenges of realizing the everyday endeavor of privacy in datafied environments.

Author Biographies

Jakub Nowak, Maria Curie Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland

Jakub Nowak is an associate professor in the Institute of Social Communication and Media Studies at Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Poland. His research interests include political, cultural, and social aspects of digital technologies. E-mail: jakub.nowak@mail.umcs.pl

Johanna E. Möller, TU Dresden University of Technology, Germany

Johanna E. Möller is a researcher at the Institute of Media and Communication at TU Dresden University of Technology, Germany. She is one of the principal investigators of the interdisciplinary research project "Disruptions of Networed Privacy" at the "TU Dresden Disruption and Societal Change" research centre (TUDiSC). Her scholarly work is located at the intersection of media sociology, political communication and socio-technical theory. E-mail: johanna_e.moeller@tu-dresden.de

References

Ball, K. (2005). Organization, Surveillance and the Body: Towards a Politics of Resistance. Organization, 12(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405048578

Balleys, C., & Coll, S. (2017). Being publicly intimate: Teenagers managing online privacy. Media, Culture & Society, 39(6), 885–901. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716679033

Banks, J. (2015). The Heartbleed bug: Insecurity repackaged, rebranded and resold. Crime, Media, Culture, 11(3), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659015592792

Barnes, S. B. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, (11)9. http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1394/1312

Bennett, C., (2008). The Privacy Advocates: Resisting the Spread of Surveillance. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Brandimarte, L., Acquisti, A., & Loewenstein, G. (2013). Misplaced Confidences: Privacy and the Control Paradox. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(3), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612455931

Büchi, M., Just, N., & Latzer, M. (2017). Caring is not enough: The importance of Internet skills for online privacy protection. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1261–1278. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1229001

Cotter, K. (2019). Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society, 21(4), 895–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818815684

Couldry, N. (2004). Theorising media as practice. Social Semiotics, 14(2), 115–132. doi.org/10.1080/1035033042000238295

Couldry N., Hepp A. 2017. The mediated construction of reality. Cambridge, Malden, MA: Polity.

Dienlin, T., & Metzger, M. J. (2016). An extended privacy calculus model for SNSs: Analyzing self-disclosure and self-withdrawal in a representative US sample. Journal of Computer­‑Mediated Communication, 21(5), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12163

Dourish, P., Grinter, R. E., Delgado de la Flor, J., & Joseph, M. (2004). Security in the wild: User strategies for managing security as an everyday, practical problem. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8(6), 391–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-004-0308-5

Emmel, N. (2013). Sampling and Choosing Cases in Qualitative Research. A Realist Approach. London: SAGE.

Gallagher, K., Patil, S., & Memon, N. (2017). New Me: Understanding Expert and Non­‑Expert Perceptions and Usage of the Tor Anonymity Network. 15.

Giddens, A. (1986). The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press: Berkeley.

Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738

Gstrein, O. J., & Beaulieu, A. (2022). How to protect privacy in a datafied society? A presentation of multiple legal and conceptual approaches. Philosophy & Technology, 35(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00497-4

Hintz, A., Dencik, L., Wahl­‑Jorgensen, K. (2019). Digital citizenship in a datafied society. Medford, MA: Polity.

Kannengießer, S., Kubitschko, S. (2017). Acting on media: influencing, shapingand and (re)configuring the fabric of everyday life. Media and Communication, 5(3), 1–4. doi.org/10.17645/mac.v5i3.1165

Kennedy, H., Poell, T., & van Dijck, J. (2015). Data and agency. Big Data & Society, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715621569

Kennedy H., Elgesem D., Miguel C. 2017. On fairness: User perspectives on social media data mining. Convergence, 23(3), 270–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856515592507

Kubitschko, S. (2015). Hackers’ media practices: Demonstrating and articulating expertise as interlocking arrangements. Convergence, 21(3), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/135485651557984

Kumar, P. C., Subramaniam, M., Vitak, J., Clegg, T. L., & Chetty, M. (2020). Strengthening Children’s Privacy Literacy through Contextual Integrity. Media and Communication, 8(4), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3236

Lyon, D. (2018). The Culture of Surveillance. Watching as a Way of Life. Cambridge: Polity

Marwick A. (2013). Status Update. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

Marwick, A. E., & boyd, danah. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1051–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543995

Martin, A.K., van Brakel, R.E., Bernhard, D. (2009). Understanding resistance to digital surveillance: Towards a multi-disciplinary, multi-actor framework. Surveillance & Society, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v6i3.3282

Masur, P. K. (2020). How Online Privacy Literacy Supports Self­‑Data Protection and Self­‑Determination in the Age of Information. Media and Communication, 8(2), 258–269. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2855

Mattoni, A. (2012). Media practices and protest politics. How precarious workers mobilise. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Milan, S., Hintz, A. (2013). Networked Collective Action and the Institutionalized Policy Debate. Bringing Cyberactivism to the Policy Arena? Policy and Internet, 5(1), 7–26. doi.org/10.1002/poi3.20

Möller, Johanna E. (2024 a). Privacy. In Alessandro Nai; Max Groemping; Dominique Wirz (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Political Communication, SAGE (forthcoming).

Möller, Johanna E. (2024b). Situational privacy: theorizing privacy as communication and media practice. Communication Theory, 34(3), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtae011

Möller, J., & Mollen, A. (2017). “Please stay frustrated!” The politicisation of media technologies in the German NSA debate. In R. Kunelius, H. Heikkilä, A. Russell, & D. Yagodin (Eds.), Journalism and the NSA revelations (pp. 113–127). Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

Nahuis R, van Lente H. (2008). Where Are the Politics? Perspectives on Democracy and Technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33(5), 559–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907306700

Nippert­‑Eng C. 2010. Islands of Privacy. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

Park, Y. J. (2013). Digital Literacy and Privacy Behavior Online. Communication Research, 40(2), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211418338

Patton M. 2002. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage.

Pink, S., Hjorth, L., Horst, H., Nettheim, J., & Bell, G. (2018). Digital work and play: Mobile technologies and new ways of feeling at home. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417705602

Sevignani, S. (2015). Privacy and Capitalism in the Age of Social Media (Illustrated Edition). Taylor & Francis Ltd.

Tiemann, A., Melzer, A., & Steffgen, G. (2021). Nationwide implementation of media literacy training sessions on internet safety. Communications, 46(3), 394–418. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2021-0049

Trepte, S., Reinecke, L., Ellison, N. B., Quiring, O., Yao, M. Z., & Ziegele, M. (2017). A Cross­‑Cultural Perspective on the Privacy Calculus. Social Media + Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116688035

Trepte, S. (2021). The Social Media Privacy Model: Privacy and Communication in the Light of Social Media Affordances. Communication Theory, 31(4), 549–570. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz035

Westin, A. F. (2003). Social and Political Dimensions of Privacy: Social and Political. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 431–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00072

Zuboff, S. (2019). Surveillance Capitalism and the Challenge of Collective Action. New Labor Forum, 28(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796018819461

Downloads

Published

2025-08-20

How to Cite

Nowak, J., & Möller, J. E. . (2025). Doing Privacy: Exploring the Limits of Self-Determination. Central European Journal of Communication, 17(4(38), 531-549. https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.17.4(38).637

Issue

Section

Scientific Papers