A values-based Union worthy of the name? Free speech and the trajectory of EU media law and policies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.18.1(39).671Keywords:
EU values, freedom of expression, European Media Freedom Act, rule of law, European Democracy Action PlanAbstract
Article 2 TEU lays down the values upon which the Union is founded: respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality and the rule of law, along with respect for human rights. Although the EU does not have a general competence to legislate in the field of fundamental rights, it has been active since the Treaty of Lisbon in developing initiatives which touch upon freedom of expression, freedom of information and the role of the media in regard to both. This article studies the nature and evolution of the EU activity in question, exploring its characteristics and the ways in which it has developed. It examines the gradual expansion of the Union’s action, delving into the instruments adopted and the density and breadth of regulation in the field. The initiatives submitted under the framework of the Commission’s European Democracy Action Plan, and in particular the proposed European Media Freedom Act, hold the promise that core challenges relating to media freedom will be addressed. This marks a break from fragmented approaches of the past, whereby free speech considerations were embedded in EU media law and policies.
References
Ausloos, J. (2020). The right to erasure in EU data protection law. Oxford University Press.
Bonelli, M., and M. Claes, M. (2023). Crossing the Rubicon? The Commission’s use of Article 2 TEU in the infringement action on LGBTIQ+ rights in Hungary. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 30(1) 3–14.
Brogi., E., Borges, D., Carlini, R., Nenadic, I., Bleyer‑Simon, K., Kermer, J., Reviglio, U., Trevisan, M. and Verza, S. (2023). The European Media Freedom Act: Media freedom, freedom of expression and pluralism. Study requested by the LIBE Committee.
Brogi, E. and Parcu, P.L. (2014). Evolving regulation for media freedom and pluralism in the European Union. Utilities Policy, 31, 256–265.
Broughton Micova, S., and Kukliš, Ľ. (2023). Responsibilities of video-sharing platforms and their users. In H. Ranaivoson, S. Broughton Micova and T. Raats (Eds). European audiovisual policy in transition (77–92). Routledge.
Cabrera Blázquez F.J., Cappello, M. Fontaine G., and Valais. S. (2017). Exceptions and limitations to copyright. IRIS Plus. European Audiovisual Observatory. https://rm.coe.int/168078348b.
Cantero Gamito, M. (2023). The European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) as meta-regulation. Computer Law & Security Review 48, DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105799.
Chase, P.H. (2019). The EU Code of Practice on Disinformation: The difficulty of regulating a nebulous problem. https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/EU_Code_Practice_Disinformation_ Aug_2019.pdf.
Cole, M.D., and Etteldorf, C. (2023). European Media Freedom Act Background Analysis. Study requested by the CULT Committee. Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, Directorate‑General for Internal Policies. PE 733.129 – April 2023.
Cole, M.D., and Etteldorf, C. (2021). Secondary law provisions on media ownership. In M. Cappello (ed.), Transparency of media ownership (17–30). IRIS Special. European Audiovisual Observatory.
Council of Europe (2014). Recommendation on the protection of whistleblowers. https://www.coe.int/en/web/youth/-/recommendation-on-the-protection-of-whistleblowers.
Council of the European Communities (1990). Council Decision 90/685/EEC of 21 December 1990, concerning the implementation of an action programme to promote the development of the European audiovisual industry (MEDIA, 1991 to 1995). (1990) OJ L 380.
Council of the European Communities (1989). Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities. (1989) OJ L 298.
Council of the European Union (2023a). Regulation on the European Media Freedom Act – Progress report 8679/1/23. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-8679–2023-REV-1/en/pdf.
Council of the European Union (2023b). European Media Freedom Act: Council secures mandate for negotiations [Press release]. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2023/06/21/european-media-freedom-act-council-secures-mandate-for-negotiations/.
Council of the European Union (2022). Regulation establishing the European Media Freedom Act. Progress report 14440/22. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-14440–2022-INIT/en/pdf.
Council of the European Union (2008). Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law (2008). OJ L 328/55.
Craufurd Smith, R. (2004). Rethinking European Union competence in the field of media ownership: The internal market, fundamental rights and European citizenship. European Law Review, 29(5), 652–672.
Dawson, M. & de Witte, F. (2022). EU law and governance. Cambridge University Press.
Erdos D. (2021). Special, personal and broad expression: Exploring freedom of expression norms under the General Data Protection Regulation. Yearbook of European Law, 40(1), 398–430.
European Commission (2024). The Code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech online +.
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/code-conduct-countering-illegal-hate-speech-online.
European Commission (2023). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Defence of Democracy. COM(2023) 630 final.
European Commission (2022a). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on protecting persons who engage in public participation from manifestly unfounded or abusive court proceedings (“Strategic lawsuits against public participation”). COM(2022) 177 final.
European Commission (2022b). Recommendation (EU) 2022/758 on protecting journalists and human rights defenders who engage in public participation from manifestly unfounded or abusive court proceedings (’Strategic lawsuits against public participation’). (2022) OJ L 138/30.
European Commission (2022c). The strengthened code of practice on disinformation. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/2022-strengthened-code-practice-disinformation.
European Commission (2022d). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a common framework for media services in the internal market (European Media Freedom Act) and amending Directive 2010/13/EU. COM (2022) 457.
European Commission (2022e). Commission Recommendation (EU) 2022/1634 of 16 September 2022 on internal safeguards for editorial independence and ownership transparency in the media sector. (2022) OJ L 245/56.
European Commission (2021). Recommendation (EU) 2021/1534 on ensuring the protection, safety and empowerment of journalists and other media professionals in the European Union. (2021) OJ L 331/8.
European Commission (2020a). Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European democracy action plan. COM(2020) 790 final.
European Commission (2020b). Europe’s Media in the Digital Decade: An Action Plan to Support Recovery and Transformation. COM(2020) 784.
European Commission (2020c). Shaping Europe’s Digital Future. COM(2020) 67.
European Commission (2019). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Strengthening the rule of law within the Union. A blueprint for action. COM(2019) 343 final.
European Commission (2018a). Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Tackling online disinformation: Α European approach. COM(2018) 236 final.
European Commission (2018b). Recommendation (EU) 2018/103 regarding the rule of law in Poland complementary to Recommendations (EU) 2016/1374, (EU) 2017/146 and (EU) 2017/1520. (2018) OJ L 17/50.
European Commission (2017). Recommendation (EU) 2017/1520 regarding the rule of law in Poland complementary to Recommendations (EU) 2016/1374 and (EU) 2017/146. (2017) OJ L 17/19.
European Commission (2016a). Code of Conduct on Countering Illegal Hate Speech Online. https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/combatting-discrimination/racism-and-xenophobia/eu-code-conduct-countering-illegal-hate-speech-online_en. Accessed 24 Sept 2023.
European Commission (2016b). Commission Opinion on the Rule of Law in Poland and the Rule of Law Framework: Questions & Answers. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_16_2017.
European Commission (2016c). Recommendation (EU) 2016/1374 regarding the rule of law in Poland. (2016) OJ L 217/53.
European Commission (2014). Communication from the Commission on a new EU Framework to strengthen the Rule of Law. COM(2014) 158 final.
European Parliament and Council (2024a). Directive 2024/1069 of the European Parliament and of the Council on protecting persons who engage in public participation from manifestly unfounded claims or abusive court proceedings (Strategic lawsuits against public participation). (2024) OJ L 2024/1069.
European Parliament and Council (2024b). Regulation (EU) 2024/1083 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 establishing a common framework for media services in the internal market and amending Directive 2010/13/EU (European Media Freedom Act). (2024) OJ L 2024/1083.
European Parliament and Council (2022). Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 on a Single Market for Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act). (2022) OJ L 277/1.
European Parliament and Council (2021). Regulation (EU) 2021/818 establishing the Creative Europe Programme (2021 to 2027) and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013. (2021) OJ L 189/34.
European Parliament and Council (2019a). Directive (EU) 2019/790 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC. (2019) OJ L 130/92.
European Parliament and Council (2019b). Directive 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law. (2019) OJ L 305/17.
European Parliament and Council (2018). Directive (EU) 2018/1808 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) in view of changing market realities. (2018) OJ L 303/69.
European Parliament and Council (2016). Regulation on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). (2016) OJ L 119/1.
European Parliament and Council (2014). Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing the Creative Europe Programme (2014 to 2020) and repealing Decisions No 1718/2006/EC, No 1855/2006/EC and No 1041/2009/EC. (2014) OJ L 347/221.
European Parliament and Council (2010). Directive 2010/13/EU on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive). (2010) OJ L 95/1.
European Parliament and Council (2001). Directive 2001/29/EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. (2001) OJ L 167/10.
Guibault, L. (2010). Why cherry-picking never leads to harmonisation: The case of the limitations on copyright under Directive 2001/29/EC. JIPITEC, 55(1).
Harcourt, A. (2005). The European Union and the regulation of media markets. Manchester University Press.
Heldt, A.P. (2022). EU Digital Services Act: The white hope of intermediary regulation. In: Flew, T., Martin, F.R. (eds.), Digital Platform Regulation. Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business. Palgrave Macmillan.
High‑Level Group on Fake News and Online Disinformation (2018). A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/final-report-
high-level-expert-group-fake-news-and-online-disinformation.
Holtz‑Bacha, C. (2023). Freedom of the media, pluralism, and transparency. European media policy on new paths? European Journal of Communication, 39(1), 37–55.
Howard, J.W. (2019). Free speech and hate speech. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 93–109.
Husovec, M. (2024). Principles of the Digital Services Act. Oxford University Press.
Inglezakis, I. (2017). The legal regulation of hate speech on the internet. In T-E. Synodinou, P. Jougleux, C. Markou and T. Prastitou (eds), EU internet law: Regulation and enforcement (367–383). Springer.
Izyumenko, E. (2016). The freedom of expression contours of copyright in the digital era: A European perspective. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 19 (3–3), 115–130.
Kochenov, D. (2021). Article 7: A commentary on a much talked-about “dead” provision. In A. von Bogdandy, P. Bogdanowicz, I. Canor, C. Grabenwarter, M. Taborowski and M. Schmidt (eds), Defending checks and balances in EU Member States (127–154). Springer.
Kochenov, D. (2017). The acquis and its principles: The enforcement of the ‘law’ vs. the enforcement of ‘values’ in the European Union. In A. Jakab and D. Kochenov (eds), The enforcement of EU law and values ensuring Member States’ compliance (9–27). Oxford University Press.
Kukliš, Ľ. (2021). Video-sharing platforms in AVMSD – A new kind of content regulation. In P.L. Parcu & E. Brogi (Eds.), Research handbook on EU media law and policy (303–325). Edward Elgar Publishing.
von der Leyen, U. (2021), 2021 State of the Union address by President von der Leyen. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_21_4701.
von der Leyen, U. (2019). Political guidelines for the next European Commission 2019–2024, A Union that strives for more. My agenda for Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2775/101756.
Lock, T. (2012). Accession of the EU to the ECHR. Who would be responsible in Strasbourg?. In D. Ashiagbor, N. Countouris and I. Lianos (Eds.), The European Union after the Treaty of Lisbon (109–135). Cambridge University Press.
Maoli, F. (2024). Strategic lawsuits against public participation and their global relevance. Recent developments and persisting gaps in human rights law and in (EU) PIL. Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies, 2, 289–321.
Milewska, P. (2023, June 15). SLAPPs, Daphne’s law, and the future of journalism, Verfassingsblog. https://verfassungsblog.de/author/paulina-milewska/.
Monti, M. (2020). The EU code of practice on disinformation and the risk of the privatisation of censorship. In S. Giusti and E. Piras (Eds.), Democracy and fake news. Information manipulation and post-truth politics (214–225). Routledge.
Mylly, T. (2015). The constitutionalization of the European legal order: Impact of human rights on intellectual property in the EU. In C. Geiger (ed.), Research Handbook on human rights and intellectual property (103–131). Edward Elgar.
Pech, L. (2020). Article 7 TEU: From “nuclear option” to “Sisyphean procedure”? In U. Belavusau and A. Gliszczyńska‑Grabias (Eds.), Constitutionalism under stress (157–174). Oxford University Press 2020.
Pech, L. (2010). ‘A Union founded on the rule of law’: Meaning and reality of the rule of law as a constitutional principle of EU law. European Constitutional Law Review, 6(3), 359–396.
Peers, S., & Prechal S. (2021). Article 52. In S. Peers, T. Hervey and A. Ward (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A commentary (1611–1674). Hart Publishing.
Pentney, K., and McGonagle, T. (2021). From Risk to Reward? The DSA’s risk-based approach to disinformation. In M. Cappello (Ed.), Unravelling the Digital Services Act package (40–57). European Audiovisual Observatory.
Piris, J-C. (2010). The Lisbon Treaty. A legal and political analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Politico (2024). Hungary takes EU to court over media freedom (15 July 2024). https://www.politico.eu/article/hungary-take-eu-court-over-media-freedom-viktor-orban/
Pollicino, O. (2023). Freedom of speech and the regulation of fake news. Intersentia.
Psychogiopoulou, E. Vlassis, A., Samaras, A., Comerma, L. and Riga, D. (2024). Competitiveness in European Law. Developed by the Horizon Europe project REBOOT (Reviving, Boosting, Optimising and Transforming European Film Competitiveness – REBOOT), https://thereboot-project.eu/research.
Psychogiopoulou, E. (2024). The fight against digital hate speech: Disentangling the EU’s regulatory approach and hurdles. German Law Journal, 25(7), 1182-1196.
Psychogiopoulou, E. (2022). Judicial dialogue and digitalization: CJEU engagement with ECtHR case law and fundamental rights standards in the EU. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law (JIPITEC), 13(2), 145-159.
Quintel T., and Ullrich, T. (2020). Self-regulation of fundamental rights? The EU Code of Conduct on Hate Speech, related initiatives and beyond. In B. Petkova and T. Ojanen (eds), Fundamental rights protection online. The future regulation of intermediaries (182–204). Edward Elgar.
Scheppele, K.L., Kochenov, D.V. and Grabowska‑Moroz, B. (2020). EU values are law, after all: Enforcing EU values through systemic infringement actions by the European Commission and the Member States of the European Union. Yearbook of European Law, 39(1), 3–121.
de Schutter, O. (2016). The implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights in the EU institutional framework. Study for the European Parliament’s Committee on Constitutional Affairs. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/571397/IPOL_STU(2016)571397_EN.pdf.
Spieker, L.D. (2023). EU values before the Court of Justice: Foundations, potential, risks. Oxford University Press.
Tambini, D. (2022). The democratic fightback has begun: The European Commission’s new European Media Freedom Act. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/medialse/2022/09/20/the-democratic-fightback-has-begun-the-european-commissions-new-european-media-freedom-act/
Terzis, G., Kloza, D., Kużelewska, E., and Trottier, D. (Eds) (2021). Disinformation and digital media as a challenge for democracy. Intersentia.
Turillazzi, A., Taddeo, M., Floridi, L., and Casolari, F. (2023). The Digital Services Act: An analysis of its ethical, legal, and social implications. Law, Innovation and Technology, 15(1), 83–106.
Vandekerckhove, W. (2022). Is it freedom? The coming about of the EU Directive on whistleblower protection. Journal of Business Ethics, 179, 1–11.
de Witte, B. (2014). Conclusions. Integration clauses: A comparative epilogue. In F. Ippolito, M.E. Bartoloni and M. Condinanzi (Eds.). The EU and the proliferation of integration principles under the Lisbon Treaty (181–188). Routledge.
de Witte, B. (2006). Non-market values in internal market legislation. In N.N. Shuibhne (ed.), Regulating the internal market (61–86). Edward Elgar
Ward, A. (2021). Article 51. In S. Peers, T. Hervey and A. Ward (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A commentary (1553–1610). Hart Publishing.
Wardle, C. and Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder. Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe report DGI(2017)09.
Woods, L. (2021). Article 11. In S. Peers, T. Hervey and A. Ward (Eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A commentary (333–370). Hart Publishing.
Wouters, J. (2020). Revisiting Art. 2 TEU: A true union of values? European Papers 5(1) 255–277.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Polish Communication Association
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
