Geographical Proximity of War as a Catalyst for Variations in the Frequencies of Emotional Appeals in Pre-Election Debates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.18.2(40).725Keywords:
political communication, emotional appeals, war proximity, pre-election debates, populismAbstract
Appealing to fear was widely believed to be a rhetorical strategy behind the last decade’s successes of populists. Recent empirical studies, however, show that this perception has been oversimplified. highlighting that emotional appeals are frequently used by politicians across the spectrum and that their distribution is shaped by multiple factors. Our study contributes to this field by introducing another dimension: proximity to war. We hypothesize that politicians in countries bordering a militarily aggressive neighbor would aim to evoke different emotions than their peers running for office in countries distant from it. To validate this hypothesis, we employed a Large Language Model (GPT-4) to assess emotional appeals in pre-election debates in six European countries (Estonia, Poland, Finland, Greece, Spain, the Netherlands). Our results confirm that appeals to fear dominate debates in countries close to conflict, while appeals to anger prevail in those more distant from it. Consequently, studies on populism and political communication in general, should consider conflict proximity as a crucial variable.
References
Anghel, V., & Jones, E. (2023). Is Europe really forged through crisis? Pandemic EU and the Russia–Ukraine war. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(4), 643-662.
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Harvard University Press.
Åhs, F., Dunsmoor, J. E., Zielinski, D., & LaBar, K. S. (2015). Spatial proximity amplifies valence in emotional memory and defensive approach-avoidance. Neuropsychologia, 70, 476-485.
Bargetz, B. (2015). The distribution of emotions: Affective politics of emancipation. Hypatia, 30(3), 580-596.
Baum, M. A. (2002). The constituent foundations of the rally-round-the-flag phenomenon. International Studies Quarterly, 46(2), 263-298.
Benoit, W. L. (2013). Political election debates: Informing voters about policy and character. Lexington Books.
Benoit, W. L., Hansen, G. J., & Verser, R. M. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing US presidential debates. Communication Monographs, 70(4), 335-350.
Boehnke, K., & Schwartz, S. H. (1997). Fear of war: Relations to values, gender, and mental health in Germany and Israel. Peace and Conflict, 3(2), 149-165.
Boler, M., & Davis, E. (2018). The affective politics of the „post-truth” era: Feeling rules and networked subjectivity. Emotion, Space and Society, 27, 75-85.
Bonikowski, B. (2017). Ethno‐nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment. The British Journal of Sociology, 68(S1), S181-S213.
Bossetta, M., & Schmøkel, R. (2024). Cross-platform emotions and audience engagement in social media political campaigning: Comparing candidates’ Facebook and Instagram images in the 2020 US election. In R. Schmøkel & M. Bossetta (Eds.), Dissonant public spheres (pp. 35-55). Routledge.
Brader, T. (2020). Campaigning for hearts and minds: How emotional appeals in political ads work. University of Chicago Press.
Clément, M., & Sangar, E. (Eds.). (2017). Researching emotions in international relations: Methodological perspectives on the emotional turn. Springer.
Coleman, S. (2020). Televised election debates as spectacle and reflection. International Perspectives, 45(2), 123-142.
Coleman, S., & Moss, G. (2016). Rethinking election debates: What citizens are entitled to expect. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(1), 3-24.
Durkheim, E. (1893). De la division du travail [The division of labour]. Presses Universitaires de France.
Edelman, M. (2013). Politics as symbolic action: Mass arousal and quiescence. Elsevier.
Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 6(3-4), 169-200.
Finlayson, A. (2022). YouTube and political ideologies: Technology, populism and rhetorical form. Political Studies, 70(1), 62-80.
Furedi, F. (2018). How fear works: Culture of fear in the twenty-first century. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Gerstlé, J., & Nai, A. (2019). Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success. European Journal of Communication, 34(4), 410-444.
Gil, M. (2016). Emotions and political rhetoric: Perception of danger, group conflict and the biopolitics of fear. Human Affairs, 26(2), 212-226.
Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., & Kubli, M. (2023). ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(30), e2305016120.
Goldman, S. K., & Mutz, D. C. (2011). The friendly media phenomenon: A cross-national analysis of cross-cutting exposure. Political Communication, 28(1), 42-66.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029-1046.
Groenendyk, E. W., & Banks, A. J. (2014). Emotional rescue: How affect helps partisans overcome collective action problems. Political Psychology, 35(3), 359-378.
Guriev, S., & Papaioannou, E. (2022). The political economy of populism. Journal of Economic Literature, 60(3), 753-832.
Hawkins, K. A. (2009). Is Chávez populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 42(8), 1040-1067.
Huang, Y. L., Starbird, K., Orand, M., Stanek, S. A., & Pedersen, H. T. (2015). Connected through crisis: Emotional proximity and the spread of misinformation online. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 969-980). ACM.
Jamieson, K. H., & Adasiewicz, C. (2000). What can voters learn from election debates? In S. Coleman (Ed.), Televised election debates (pp. 25-42). Palgrave Macmillan.
Jones, P. E., Hoffman, L. H., & Young, D. G. (2013). Online emotional appeals and political participation: The effect of candidate affect on mass behavior. New Media & Society, 15(7), 1132-1150.
Kemmelmeier, M., & Winter, D. G. (2000). Putting threat into perspective: Experimental studies on perceptual distortion in international conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(7), 795-809.
Konat, B., Gajewska, E., & Rossa, W. (2024). Pathos in natural language argumentation: Emotional appeals and reactions. Argumentation, 38, 369-403.
Kubin, E., & von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188-206.
Long, W. J., & Brecke, P. (2003). War and reconciliation: Reason and emotion in conflict resolution. MIT Press.
Marcus, G. E. (2000). Emotions in politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 221-250.
Margalit, Y. (2019). Economic insecurity and the causes of populism, reconsidered. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(4), 152-170.
Martelli, J.-T., & Jaffrelot, C. (2023). Do populist leaders mimic the language of ordinary citizens? Evidence from India. Political Psychology, 44(5), 889-908.
McDermott, R. (2020). Leadership and the strategic emotional manipulation of political identity: An evolutionary perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(2), 101218.
McDonnell, D., & Ondelli, S. (2022). The language of right-wing populist leaders: Not so simple. Perspectives on Politics, 20(3), 828-841.
Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672-682.
Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford University Press.
Mohammad, S., & Turney, P. (2010). Emotions evoked by common words and phrases: Using Mechanical Turk to create an emotion lexicon. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text (pp. 26-34). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Moon, H., Bae, B. J., & Bae, S. (2024). Developing a ChatGPT-based text extraction model to analyze effective communication elements in pandemic-related social Q&A responses. In 2024 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC) (pp. 728-731). IEEE.
Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
O’Neill, S., & Nicholson‑Cole, S. (2009). „Fear won’t do it”: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30(3), 355-379.
O’Regan, M. (2023). Introduction: Off the grid and on the road in Europe living in an age of uncertainty and polycrisis. Anthropological Journal of European Cultures, 32(2), 1-21.
Oraby, S., Reed, L., Compton, R., Riloff, E., Walker, M., & Whittaker, S. (2017). And that’s a fact: Distinguishing factual and emotional argumentation in online dialogue. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Argumentation Mining (pp. 116-126). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Plutchik, R. (2003). The nature of emotions: Human emotions have deep evolutionary roots, a fact that may explain their complexity and provide tools for clinical practice. American Scientist, 89(4), 344-350.
Polletta, F., & Lee, J. (2006). Is telling stories good for democracy? Rhetoric in public deliberation after 9/11. American Sociological Review, 71(5), 699-721.
Porat, R., Halperin, E., Mannheim, I., & Tamir, M. (2016). Together we cry: Social motives and preferences for group-based sad emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 30(1), 66-79.
Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Xu, T., Brockman, G., McLeavey, C., & Sutskever, I. (2023). Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 28492-28518). PMLR.
Rathje, S., Mirea, D. M., Sucholutsky, I., Marjieh, R., Robertson, C. E., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2024). GPT is an effective tool for multilingual psychological text analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(34), e23027431121.
Redfield, M. (2009). The rhetoric of terror: Reflections on 9/11 and the war on terror. Fordham University Press.
Rico, G., Guinjoan, M., & Anduiza, E. (2017). The emotional underpinnings of populism: How anger and fear affect populist attitudes. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 444-461.
Ridout, T. N., & Searles, K. (2011). It’s my campaign I’ll cry if I want to: How and when campaigns use emotional appeals. Political Psychology, 32(3), 439-458.
Rodrik, D. (2018). Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(1-2), 12-33.
Rønningstad, E., Velldal, E., & Øvrelid, L. (2024). A GPT among annotators: LLM-based entity-level sentiment annotation. In Proceedings of the 18th Linguistic Annotation Workshop (LAW‑XVIII) (pp. 133-139). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Rousseau, D. L., & Garcia‑Retamero, R. (2007). Identity, power, and threat perception: A cross-national experimental study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(5), 744-771.
Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161-1178.
Rychnovská, D. (2014). Securitization and the power of threat framing. Perspectives: Review of International Affairs, 2, 9-32.
Schechner, R. (2014). Playing. In G. E. Hess‑Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), The improvisation studies reader (pp. 188-199). Routledge.
Schumacher, G., Rooduijn, M., & Bakker, B. N. (2022). Hot populism? Affective responses to antiestablishment rhetoric. Political Psychology, 43(5), 851-871.
Skonieczny, A. (2018). Emotions and political narratives: Populism, Trump and trade. Politics and Governance, 6(4), 141-149.
TenHouten, W. D. (2006). A general theory of emotions and social life. Routledge.
Turkenburg, E. (2022). Televised election debates in a deliberative system: The role of framing and emotions. Democratic Theory, 9(1), 78-99.
van der Meer, T. W., Hakhverdian, A., & Aaldering, L. (2016). The contingency of voter learning: How election debates influenced voters’ ability and accuracy to position parties in the 2010 Dutch election campaign. Political Communication, 33(1), 136-157.
Volintiru, C., Surubaru, N. C., Epstein, R. A., & Fagan, A. (2024). Re-evaluating the East‑West divide in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(1), 1-19.
Walton, D. N. (1996). Argument structure: A pragmatic theory. University of Toronto Press.
Wang, Y., & Liu, H. (2018). Is Trump always rambling like a fourth-grade student? An analysis of stylistic features of Donald Trump’s political discourse during the 2016 election. Discourse & Society, 29(3), 346-361.
Wawrzyński, P. (2022). Pride and compassion: How emotional strategies target audiences in political communication? Central European Journal of Communication, 15(32), 377-395.
Wawrzyński, P., & Marszałek‑Kawa, J. (2022). Emotional dynamics of populism and its non-populist alternatives: Discussing the role of compassion and pride. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 51(4), 97-114.
Weber, C. (2013). Emotions, campaigns, and political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 66(2), 414-428.
Webster, V., Brough, P., & Daly, K. (2016). Fight, flight or freeze: Common responses for follower coping with toxic leadership. Stress and Health, 32(4), 346-354.
Widmann, T. (2021). How emotional are populists really? Factors explaining emotional appeals in the communication of political parties. Political Psychology, 42(1), 163-181.
Wierzba, M., Riegel, M., Kocoń, J., Miłkowski, P., Janz, A., Klessa, K., Kajder, A., Piasecki, M., Szewczyk, M., & Marchewka, A. (2021). Emotion norms for 6000 Polish word meanings with a direct mapping to the Polish wordnet. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 2335-2362.
Wildavsky, A., & Dake, K. (2018). Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why? In The institutional dynamics of culture, Volumes I and II (pp. 243-262). Routledge.
Yilmaz, I., & Morieson, N. (2021). A systematic literature review of populism, religion and emotions. Religions, 12(4), 272.
Zaborowski, M. (2022). Central European security: History and geography matter. NATO Defense College.
Zhu, J.-H., Milavsky, J. R., & Biswas, R. (1994). Do televised debates affect image perception more than issue knowledge? A study of the first 1992 presidential debate. Human Communication Research, 20(3), 302-333.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Polish Communication Association
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
