Distributed gatekeeping. Uncovering the patterns of linking behaviors on Facebook

Authors

  • Wojciech Walczak Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń
  • Michał Meina Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń
  • Krzysztof Olechnicki Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19195/1899-5101.10.1(18).2

Keywords:

gatekeeping, social networking sites, sharing links, Facebok, computer-mediated communication

Abstract

Based on an analysis of 770,269 links posted by 1,969 Polish Facebook users, the present article investigates how the users’ characteristics influence their link-sharing behaviors, and how these characteristics are related to social rewards received for posting links. Male users, older ones and inhabitants of larger cities tend to link more to politics-related news they also receive more social feedback for doing that while female users, younger ones and inhabitants of smaller locations tend to link more to entertainment-related sites. The cluster analysis of linking strategies of Facebook users suggests that the most common behavior is to provide a mixture of news and entertainment-related links, although pure “news-keeper” and “entertainment-keeper” types of users are distinguishable.

Author Biographies

Wojciech Walczak, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń

Wojciech Walczak is a Ph.D. candidate at the Institute of Sociology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland. A sociologist and data analyst, his sociological research interests revolve around digital media’s impact on society, as well as social and socio-digital inequalities. Professionally, he is a software engineer focused on text processing and machine learning.

Michał Meina, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń

Michał Meina is a Research Assistant at the Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Informatics, NCU Toruń. His research interests intersect a variety of fields in Computer Science: data mining and machine learning, body sensor networks, databases and stream processing. He is actively involved in many interdisciplinary projects.

Krzysztof Olechnicki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń

Krzysztof Olechnicki is an Associate Professor and Head of The Section of Cultural Studies in the Institute of Sociology at the NCU in Toruń, and also President of The Jan Mylius Scientific Society of Elbląg. His major research areas include sociology of internet, sociology of religion, visual sociology and new social movements.

References

Baek, K., Holton, A., Harp, D., Yaschur, C. (2011). The links that bind: Uncovering novel motivations for linking on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (6), pp. 2243–2248.

Baresch, B., Knight, L., Harp, D., Yaschur, C. (2011). Friends who choose your news: An analysis of content links on Facebook. ISOJ: The Official Research Journal of International Symposium on Online Journalism, Austin, TX, 1 (2). Retrieved November 30, 2013 from http://online.journal-ism.utexas.edu/2011/papers/Baresch2011.pdf.

Batorski, D. (2011). Use of information and communication technologies. Contemporary Econom-ics, 5 (3), pp. 233–234.

Bernstein, M.S., Bakshy, E., Burke, M., Karrer, B. (2013). Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks. In: ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

Bozdag, V.E. (2015). Bursting the Filter Bubble: Democracy, Design, and Ethics (Doctoral dissertation, TU Delft, Delft University of Technology).

Brandtzæg, P.B., Lüders, M., Skjetne, J.H. (2010). Too many Facebook “friends”? Content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites. International Journal of Hu-man-Computer Interaction, 26 (11), pp. 1006–1030.

Bruns, A. (2003). Gatewatching, not gatekeeping: Collaborative online news. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy. Quarterly Journal of Media Research and Resources, 107, pp. 31–44.

Bucher, T. (2012). Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Face-book. New Media & Society, 14 (7), pp. 1164–1180.

Democracy UK. (2010). A snapshot of Facebook in 2010. Retrieved November 25, 2013 from https:// www.facebook.com/notes/democracy-uk-on-facebook/a-snapshot-of-facebook-in-2010/ 172769082761603.

Diaz, A. (2008). Through the Google goggles: Sociopolitical bias in search engine design. In: Spink, A., Zimmer, M. (eds.). Web Search: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 11–34.

Diddi, A., LaRose, R. (2006). Getting hooked on news: Uses and gratifications and the formation of news habits among college students in an internet environment. Journal of Broadcasting & Elec-tronic Media, 50 (2), pp. 193–210.

Dunne, Á., Lawlor, M.A., Rowley, J. (2010). Young people’s use of online social networking sites — a uses and gratifications perspective. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 4 (1), pp. 46– 58.

Ellison, N.B., Boyd, D.M. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13 (1), pp. 210–230.

Facebook.com. (2014). Create Ad. Available at: https://www.facebook.com/ads/create/.

Glynn, C.J., Huge, M.E., Hoffman, L.H. (2012). All the news that’s fit to post: A profile of news use on social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (1), pp. 113–119.

Hargittai, E., Walejko, G. (2008). The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication and Society, 11 (2), pp. 239–256.

Holbert, R.L., Garrett, R.K., Gleason, L.S. (2010). A new era of minimal effects? A response to Ben-nett and Iyengar. Journal of Communication, 60 (1), pp. 15–34.

Karahasanović, A., Brandtzæg, P.B., Heim, J., Lüders, M., Vermeir, L., Pierson, J., Lievens, B., Vanattenhoven, J., Jans, G. (2009). Co-creation and user-generated content — elderly people’s user requirements. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (3), pp. 655–678.

Lee, C.S., Ma, L. (2012). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experi-ence. Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (2), pp. 331–339.

McAndrew, F.T., Jeong, H.S. (2012). Who does what on Facebook? Age, sex, and relationship status as predictors of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (6), pp. 2359–2365.

Nadkarni, A., Hofmann, S.G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Dif-ferences, 52, pp. 243–249.

Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin UK.

Robertson, S.P., Vatrapu, R.K., Medina, R. (2009, May). The social life of social networks: Facebook linkage patterns in the 2008 US presidential election. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Social Networks: Making Connections between Citizens, Data and Government. Digital Government Society of North America, pp. 6–15.

Rogers, R. (2009). The Googlization question, and the inculpable engine. In: Becker, K., Stalder, F. (eds.). Deep Search: The Politics of Search Engines Beyond Google. Innsbruck: Studien Verlag, pp. 173–184.

Rubin, A.M. (1984). Ritualized and instrumental television viewing. Journal of Communication, 34 (3), pp. 67–77.

Ruggiero, T.E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3 (1), pp. 3–37.

Schiffer, A. (2007, August). Between pajamas and Pulitzers: Distributed gatekeeping and the potential of blogs as news media. In: Conference Papers — American Political Science Association, pp. 1–40.

Shoemaker, P.J., Reese, S.D. (1996). Mediating the Message. White Plains, NY: Longman.

Smith, B. (2012). One chart that explains the transformation of media in 2012. BuzzFeed, published July 18, 2012. Retrieved November 25, 2013 from http://www.buzzfeed.com/bensmith/one-chart-that-explains-the-transformation-of-medi.

Stefanone, M.A., Lackaff, D. (2009). Reality television as a model for online behavior: Blogging, photo, and video sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14 (4), pp. 964–987.

Valenzuela, S., Park, N., Kee, K.F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediat-ed Communication, 14 (4), pp. 875–901.

Webster, J.G., Ksiazek, T.B. (2012). The dynamics of audience fragmentation: Public attention in an age of digital media. Journal of Communication, 62 (1), pp. 39–56.

WirtualneMedia.pl. (2013). Facebook zyskuje na wsi, NK.pl traci „białych kołnierzyków” — raport o social media w Polsce [Facebook gains users in the countrywide, NK.pl loses white collars — a report on social media in Poland]. WirtualneMedia.pl, published June 11, 2012. Retrieved November 25, 2013 from http://www.wirtualnemedia.pl/artykul/facebook-zyskuje-na-wsi-nk-pl-traci-bialych-kolnierzykow-raport-o-social-media-w-polsce.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-31

How to Cite

Walczak, W., Meina, M., & Olechnicki, K. (2017). Distributed gatekeeping. Uncovering the patterns of linking behaviors on Facebook . Central European Journal of Communication, 10(1(18), 14-31. https://doi.org/10.19195/1899-5101.10.1(18).2

Issue

Section

Scientific Papers