A ’Safe Space’ for Disagreement?
An Experiment on the Effect of Social Media Cross-Cutting Exposure on Internal Political Efficacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.18.3(41).673Keywords:
cross-cutting exposure, internal political efficacy, social media, experimental research, health care systemAbstract
We investigate whether cross-cutting and mixed exposure to political information on social media is associated with users’ internal political efficacy using an online survey experiment. Existing research has demonstrated several benefits of cross-cutting exposure, but they have also shown its dark side. Mutz (2006) found that political ambivalence is significantly associated with cross-cutting talk as disagreement makes people more uncertain about their political views. However, it has been not investigated if cross-cutting exposure makes people more uncertain about their own political capacities to understand politics and meaningfully participate within it. Our research question is whether this detrimental effect on internal political efficacy can be detected on social media context. The findings show that participants’ internal political efficacy is not significantly shaped by the type of exposure. Consequently, cross-cutting exposure on social media can be seen a ‘safe space’ for political disagreement where the ‘dark side’ of cross-cutting exposure cannot prevail.
References
Anspach, N. M. (2017). The New Personal Influence: How Our Facebook Friends Influence the News We Read. Political Communication, 34(4), 590–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1316329
Ardèvol‑Abreu, A., Diehl, T., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2019). Antecedents of internal political efficacy incidental news exposure online and the mediating role of political discussion. Politics, 39(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395717693251
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
Barnidge, M. (2017). Exposure to Political Disagreement in Social Media Versus Face-to-Face and Anonymous Online Settings. Political Communication, 34(2), 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1235639
Beam, M. A., Child, J. T., Hutchens, M. J., & Hmielowski, J. D. (2018). Context collapse and privacy management: Diversity in Facebook friends increases online news reading and sharing. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2296–2314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817714790
Bene, M. (2021). Topics to talk about. The effects of political topics and issue ownership on user engagement with politicians’ Facebook posts during the 2018 Hungarian general election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 18(3), 338–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1881015
Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
Bossetta, M. (2018). The Digital Architectures of Social Media: Comparing Political Campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S. Election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 471–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018763307
Boulianne, S., Oser, J., & Hoffmann, C. P. (2023). Powerless in the digital age? A systematic review and meta-analysis of political efficacy and digital media use. New Media & Society, 25(9), 2512–2536.
Bucher, T. (2012). Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14(7), 1164–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812440159
Campbell, A. (1971). The Voter Decides (First edition). Praeger.
Cardenal, A. S., Aguilar‑Paredes, C., Galais, C., & Pérez‑Montoro, M. (2019). Digital Technologies and Selective Exposure: How Choice and Filter Bubbles Shape News Media Exposure. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(4), 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219862988
Chan, M., Chen, H.-T., & Lee, F. L. F. (2017). Examining the roles of mobile and social media in political participation: A cross-national analysis of three Asian societies using a communication mediation approach. New Media & Society, 19(12), 2003–2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816653190
Chen, H.-T., & Lin, J.-S. (2021). Cross-cutting and Like-minded Discussion on Social Media: The Moderating Role of Issue Importance in the (De)mobilizing Effect of Political Discussion on Political Participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 65(1), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2021.1897822
Christensen, H. S. (2016). All the same? Examining the link between three kinds of political dissatisfaction and protest. Comparative European Politics, 14(6), 781–801. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.52
DeVito, M. A. (2017). From Editors to Algorithms. Digital Journalism, 5(6), 753–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1178592
Dobos, G., Gyulai, A., & Horváth, A. (n.d.). Felesleges erőfeszítések? Választási programok és ígéretek 2018-ban. In B. Böcskei & A. Szabó (Eds.), Várakozások és valóságok. Parlamenti választás 2018 (pp. 317–339). Napvilág Kiadó, MTA TK PTI.
Easton, D., & Dennis, J. (1967). The Child’s Acquisition of Regime Norms: Political Efficacy. American Political Science Review, 61(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953873
Eurobarometer. (2018, August 6). Public opinion in the European Union—Report. The Standard Eurobarometer survey of spring 2018 (EB89), Factsheet on Hungary. https://doi.org/10.2775/172445
Eveland, W. P., Jr, & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political Discussion Frequency, Network Size, and “Heterogeneity” of Discussion as Predictors of Political Knowledge and Participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Fishkin, J. S. (1997). The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy (Reprint edition). Yale University Press.
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Borah, P., & Goyanes, M. (2021). How do people learn about politics when inadvertently exposed to news? Incidental news paradoxical Direct and indirect effects on political knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106803
Goyanes, M., & Demeter, M. (2020). Beyond positive or negative: Understanding the phenomenology, typologies and impact of incidental news exposure on citizens’ daily lives. New Media & Society, 1461444820967679. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820967679
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
Guess, A. M., Malhotra, N., Pan, J., Barberá, P., Allcott, H., Brown, T., ... & Tucker, J. A. (2023). How do social media feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in an election campaign?. Science, 381(6656), 398–404.
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. F. (1998). Democracy and Disagreement. Belknap Press: An Imprint of Harvard University Press.
Halpern, D., Valenzuela, S., & Katz, J. E. (2017). We Face, I Tweet: How Different Social Media Influence Political Participation through Collective and Internal Efficacy. Journal of Computer‑Mediated Communication, 22(6), 320–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12198
Hmielowski, J. D., Kim, S., Hutchens, M. J., & Beam, M. A. (2018). Engaged or Disengaged? Examining the Relationship Between Electoral Ambivalence and Indicators of Political Engagement in the 2012 U.S. Election. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 26(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2018.1398164
Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks. Political Psychology, 25(1), 65–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x
Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
John, N. A., & Dvir‑Gvirsman, S. (2015). “I Don’t like You Any More”: Facebook Unfriending by Israelis during the Israel–Gaza Conflict of 2014. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 953–974. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12188
Karnowski, V., Kümpel, A. S., Leonhard, L., & Leiner, D. J. (2017). From incidental news exposure to news engagement. How perceptions of the news post and news usage patterns influence engagement with news articles encountered on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.041
Karv, T., Lindell, M., & Rapeli, L. (n.d.). How Context Matters: The Significance of Political Homogeneity and Language for Political Efficacy. Scandinavian Political Studies, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12215
Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections Between Internet Use and Political Efficacy, Knowledge, and Participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_1
Kim, Y., & Chen, H.-T. (2015). Discussion Network Heterogeneity Matters: Examining a Moderated Mediation Model of Social Media Use and Civic Engagement. International Journal of Communication, 9(0), 22.
Kim, Y., Chen, H.-T., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2013). Stumbling upon news on the Internet: Effects of incidental news exposure and relative entertainment use on political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2607–2614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.005
Knobloch‑Westerwick, S., Mothes, C., & Polavin, N. (2020). Confirmation Bias, Ingroup Bias, and Negativity Bias in Selective Exposure to Political Information. Communication Research, 47(1), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217719596
Kwak, N., Williams, A. E., Wang, X., & Lee, H. (2005). Talking Politics and Engaging Politics: An Examination of the Interactive Relationships Between Structural Features of Political Talk and Discussion Engagement. Communication Research, 32(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650204271400
Lee, F. L. F. (2012). Does Discussion With Disagreement Discourage All Types of Political Participation? Survey Evidence From Hong Kong. Communication Research, 39(4), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211398356
Lee, F. L. F., & Chan, J. M. (2009). The Political Consequences of Ambivalence: The Case of Democratic Reform in Hong Kong. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edn053
Lee, K. M. (2006). Effects of Internet Use on College Students’ Political Efficacy. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(4), 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.415
Matthes, J., Knoll, J., Valenzuela, S., Hopmann, D. N., & Von Sikorski, C. (2019). A Meta‑Analysis of the Effects of Cross‑Cutting Exposure on Political Participation. Political Communication, 36(4), 523–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1619638
McGraw, K. M., & Bartels, B. (2005). Ambivalence Toward American Political Institutions. In S. C. Craig & M. D. Martinez (Eds.), Ambivalence and the Structure of Political Opinion (pp. 105–126). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403979094_6
McPherson, M., Smith‑Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective Exposure in the Age of Social Media: Endorsements Trump Partisan Source Affiliation When Selecting News Online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466406
Moeller, J., de Vreese, C., Esser, F., & Kunz, R. (2014). Pathway to Political Participation: The Influence of Online and Offline News Media on Internal Efficacy and Turnout of First‑Time Voters. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(5), 689–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213515220
Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy (Illustrated edition). Cambridge University Press.
Nanz, A., Kaskeleviciute, R., Stubenvoll, M., & Matthes, J. (2025). Scanning vs. Thorough Processing the News: Antecedents of First-and Second‑Level Incidental Exposure and the Role of the Relevance Appraisal. Digital Journalism, Online first, 1–21.
Newhagen, J. E. (1994). Self‑Efficacy and Call-in Political Television Show Use. Communication Research, 21(3), 366–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365094021003007
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021. University of Oxford. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2021-06/Digital_News_Report_2021_FINAL.pdf
Niemi, R. G., Craig, S. C., & Mattei, F. (1991). Measuring Internal Political Efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1407–1413. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963953
Nir, L. (2011a). Motivated Reasoning and Public Opinion Perception. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(3), 504–532. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq076
Nir, L. (2011b). Disagreement and Opposition in Social Networks: Does Disagreement Discourage Turnout? Political Studies, 59(3), 674–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00873.x
Osborne‑Crowley, K. (2020). Social cognition in the real world: Reconnecting the study of social cognition with social reality. Review of General Psychology, 24(2), 144–158
Political Capital. (2017). Gyógyítható-e az egészségügy? Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. https://www.politicalcapital.hu/pc-admin/source/documents/PC_FES_egeszsegugy_2017_tanulmany_20170613.pdf
Pollock, P. H. (1983). The Participatory Consequences of Internal and External Political Efficacy: A Research Note. Western Political Quarterly, 36(3), 400–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298303600306
Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2014). Networked: The New Social Operating System (Illustrated edition). The MIT Press.
Robinson, M. J. (1976). Public Affairs Television and the Growth of Political Malaise: The Case of “The Selling of the Pentagon”*. American Political Science Review, 70(2), 409–432. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959647
Scheufele, D. A., Hardy, B. W., Brossard, D., Waismel‑Manor, I. S., & Nisbet, E. (2006). Democracy Based on Difference: Examining the Links Between Structural Heterogeneity, Heterogeneity of Discussion Networks, and Democratic Citizenship. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 728–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00317.x
Valeriani, A., & Vaccari, C. (2016). Accidental exposure to politics on social media as online participation equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1857–1874. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815616223
van Harreveld, F., Rutjens, B. T., Rotteveel, M., Nordgren, L. F., & van der Pligt, J. (2009). Ambivalence and decisional conflict as a cause of psychological discomfort: Feeling tense before jumping off the fence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.015
Zhang, W., & Chang, L. (2014). Perceived Speech Conditions and Disagreement of Everyday Talk: A Proceduralist Perspective of Citizen Deliberation. Communication Theory, 24(2), 124–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12034
Zhu, Q., Skoric, M., & Shen, F. (2017). I Shield Myself From Thee: Selective Avoidance on Social Media During Political Protests. Political Communication, 34(1), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1222471
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Polish Communication Association
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
