Techno-pessimistic and techno-optimistic visions of surveillance and resistance in Europe

Authors

  • Vaia Doudaki Charles University, Prague https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6341-9963
  • Panos Kompatsiaris IULM University, Milan, Italy
  • Jim Ingebretsen Carlson Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC). Department of Information and Communication Sciences
  • Judith Clares-Gavilán Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC)
  • Dessislava Boshnakova New Bulgarian University (NBU), Department of Media and Communication

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.17.1(35).696

Keywords:

surveillance, resistance to surveillance, techno-optimism, techno-pessimism, future, Europe

Abstract

Our study explores peoples’ visions of surveillance and resistance to surveillance, enabled through communication and digital platforms in Europe. The research involves future scenario development and analysis, which allows us to sketch out future outlooks concerning surveillance/resistance in Europe, examining how these visions reflect the main assumptions, fears and hopes about the future of societies in Europe. The analysis, which is anchored in surveillance studies, shows how the visions of surveillance and resistance are informed by people’s dispositions towards technology, which centre around techno-optimism and techno-pessimism, focusing either on the empowering or liberating forces of technology or on technology’s disabling and destructive power. These dispositions instruct ideas about the futures of Europe, seeing Europe as either a regulator or protector of people’s privacy and freedoms or as a surveillant apparatus, curtailing peoples’ freedom and democratic rights.

Author Biographies

Vaia Doudaki, Charles University, Prague

Vaia Doudaki works as Associate Professor of Communication and Media Studies at Charles University (Institute of Communication Studies and Journalism). Her research activity and publications lie in the fields of discourse studies, journalism studies, alternative media studies and environmental communication.

Panos Kompatsiaris, IULM University, Milan, Italy

Panos Kompatsiaris is an associate professor on cultural and media theory at HSE University and research fellow in media sociology at IULM. His forthcoming book is titled Curation in the Age of Platform Capitalism The Value of Selection, Narration, and Expertise in New Media Cultures (2024).

Jim Ingebretsen Carlson, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC). Department of Information and Communication Sciences

Jim Ingebretsen Carlson works as a research fellow at the department of Communication Studies at Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (Department of Information and Communication Sciences). His research is focused on the areas of behavioural economics, behavioural medicine, and data science. 

Judith Clares-Gavilán, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC)

Judith Clares-Gavilán works as Lecturer of Communication Studies at Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (Department of Information and Communication Sciences). She is Director of the Communication Degree. Her research activity and publications lie in the fields of audiovisual policy and audiovisual market in Europe, digital distribution, SVOD, connected TV and New business models.

Dessislava Boshnakova, New Bulgarian University (NBU), Department of Media and Communication

Dessislava Boshnakova, Ph.D., is a full time professor at the department of Media and Communication at the New Bulgarian University.  Since 2019 she is Head of the Department. Her research is focused on the areas of public relations, digital communication, crowdsourcing, event management, public speaking and education.

References

Aaltola, E. (2010). Green anarchy: Deep ecology and primitivism. In B. Franks & M. Wilson (Eds.), Anarchism and moral philosophy (pp. 161–185). Palgrave Macmillan.

Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. Sage.

Bauman, Z. (2004). Wasted lives: Modernity and its outcasts. Polity.

Bellanova, R., & Glouftsios, G. (2022). Controlling the Schengen Information System (SIS II): The infrastructural politics of fragility and maintenance. Geopolitics, 27(1), 160–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1830765

Broeders, D. (2007). The new digital borders of Europe: EU databases and the surveillance of irregular migrants. International Sociology, 22(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580907070126

Brosnan, M. (1998). Technophobia: The psychological impact of information technology. Routledge.

Carpentier, N., & Doudaki, V. (2023). When the margins enter the centre: The documentary ‘Along the Borders of Turkey’ and its YouTube comments as conflicting constructions of Europeanity. In K. Loftsdóttir, B. Hipfl, & S. Ponzanesi (Eds.), Creating Europe from the margins: Mobilities and racism in postcolonial Europe (pp. 174–192). Routledge.

Carpentier, N., & Hroch, M. (2023). The EUMEPLAT Delphi+ workshops: A manual. EUMEPLAT. https://eumeplat.fsv.cuni.cz/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/EUMEPLAT-Delphi-workshops_Manual.pdf

Clarke, R. (2005). Seven misconceptions of situational crime prevention. In N. Tilley (Ed.), Handbook of crime prevention and community safety (pp. 39–70). Routledge.

Costanza, S. (2018). Surveillance. In A. Treviño (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of social problems, Vol. 2 (pp. 95–108). Cambridge University Press.

Degli Esposti, S. (2014). When big data meets dataveillance: The hidden side of analytics. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.5113

EBU (European Broadcasting Union) (2020). Market insights, trust in media 2020. https://www.horizont.net/news/media/33/Trust-in-Media-Studie-der-EBU--323478.pdf

Eurofound (2022). Maintaining trust during the COVID-19 pandemic. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2806/707872

Fernandez, L., & Huey, L. (2009). ls resistance futile? Some thoughts on resisting surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 6(3), 198–202. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v6i3.3280

Fernback, J. (2013). Sousveillance: Communities of resistance to the surveillance environment. Telematics and Informatics, 30(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2012.03.003

Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978. Palgrave Macmillan.

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Random House.

Fox, N. (2002). Against the machine: The hidden Luddite tradition in literature, art, and individual lives. Island Press.

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press.

Glenn, J., & Gordon, T. (Eds.). (2009). Futures research methodology — Version 3.0. The Millennium Project.

Gordon, T. (2009). Delphi. In J. Glenn & T. Gordon (Eds.), Futures research methodology — Version 3.0 (pp. 1–29). The Millennium Project.

Hall, M. (2021). A neo-republican critique of transparency: The chilling effects of publicizing power. In L. Viola & P. Laidler (Eds.), Trust and transparency in an age of surveillance (pp. 47–64). Routledge.

Hollander, J., & Einwohner, R. (2004). Conceptualizing resistance. Sociological Forum, 19(4), 533–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11206-004-0694-5

Inayatullah, S. (2012). Futures studies: Theories and methods. In F. Gutierrez Junquera (Ed.), There’s a future: Visions for a better world (pp. 37–65). BBVA.

Jones, S. (2006). Against technology: From the Luddites to neo­‑Luddism. Routledge.

Königs, P. (2022). What is Techno­‑Optimism?. Philosophy & Technology, 35, 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00555-x

Landeta, J. (2006). Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(5), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2005.09.002

Lindgren, S. (2017). Digital media and society. Sage.

Luhmann, N. (1976). The future cannot begin: Temporal structures in modern society. Social Research, 43(1), 130-152.

Lyon, D. (2007). Surveillance studies: An overview. Polity.

Lyon, D. (Ed.). (2003). Surveillance as social sorting: Privacy, risk and automated discrimination. Routledge.

Martin, A., Van Brakel, R., & Bernhard, D. (2009). Understanding resistance to digital surveillance: Towards a multi-disciplinary, multi-actor framework. Surveillance & Society, 6(3), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v6i3.3282

Marx, G. (2009). A tack in the shoe and taking off the shoe: Neutralization and counter-neutralization dynamics. Surveillance & Society, 6(3), 294–306. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v6i3.3286

Marwick, A., & Lewis, R. (2017). Media manipulation and disinformation online. Data & Society Research Institute.

Matthews, R., & Ross, E. (2010). Research methods: A practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education.

Miconi, A. (2022). Deliverable D2.3. Positive and negative externalities of news platformization. EUMEPLAT. https://www.eumeplat.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/D2.3_Positive-and-Negative-Externalities-of-News-Platformization.pdf

McCahill, M., & Finn, R. (2014). Surveillance, capital and resistance: Theorizing the surveillance subject. Routledge.

Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion. Public Affairs.

Murakami Wood, D. (Ed.). (2006). A report on the surveillance society. Surveillance Studies Network. https://rb.gy/pkuejq

Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. Knopf.

Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. Knopf.

Ridley, M. (2010). The rational optimist: How prosperity evolves. Harper Collins.

Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage.

Schade, F. (2023). Dark sides of data transparency: Organized immaturity after GDPR? Business Ethics Quarterly, 33(3), 473–501. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2022.30

Taylor, N. (2002). State surveillance and the right to privacy. Surveillance & Society, 1(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v1i1.3394

Topak, Ö. (2019). Humanitarian and human rights surveillance: The challenge to border surveillance and invisibility? Surveillance & Society, 17(3/4), 382–404. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i3/4.10779

Verkerk, P., Lindner, M., Pérez­‑Soba, M. et al. (2018). Identifying pathways to visions of future land use in Europe. Regional Environmental Change, 18, 817–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1055-7

Viola, L., & Laidler, P. (2021). On the relationship between trust, transparency, and surveillance. In L. Viola & P. Laidler (Eds.), Trust and transparency in an age of surveillance (pp. 3–18). Routledge.

Winner L. (1999 [1980]). Do artifacts have politics? In D. MacKenzie & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The social shaping of technology (pp. 28–40). Open University Press.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile Books.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-04

How to Cite

Doudaki, V., Kompatsiaris, P., Ingebretsen Carlson, J., Clares-Gavilán, J., & Boshnakova, D. (2024). Techno-pessimistic and techno-optimistic visions of surveillance and resistance in Europe. Central European Journal of Communication, 17(1(35), 17-37. https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.17.1(35).696