Futures of algorithms and choices

Structuration of algorithmic imaginaries and digital platforms in Europe

Authors

  • Miloš Hroch Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Communication Studies and Journalism, Charles University
  • Panos Kompatsiaris IULM, Milan
  • Volker Grassmuck Leibniz Institute for Media Research Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI), Germany
  • José Moreno MediaLab CIES Iscte, Lisboa
  • Lutz Peschke Universiteler Mah., Bilkent University Faculty of Fine Arts, Design and Architecture Department of Communication and Design, Ankara TUR
  • Jan Jirák Department of Media Studies Institute of Communication Studies and Journalism Charles University, Prague
  • Debashmita Poddar Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.17.1(35).707

Keywords:

Algorithmic imaginary, platformization, construction of the future, structuration theory, platform capitalism

Abstract

The increasing impact of algorithmically driven processes on human societies, which can exacerbate political, economic, and cultural asymmetries, raises questions about reducing human agency by constraining platform structures. We draw on the theoretical concept of algorithmic imaginary, which captures users’ appropriations and ideas of these processes. In this paper, we focus on the dynamics between agency and structure in algorithmic imaginaries regarding the future of digital media platforms in Europe. The paper takes structuration theory as a theoretical starting point and employs methods of futures studies to analyze how the future is constructed in scenarios developed by a diversity of experts participating in a series of workshops. The future scenarios analysis is mapped around four actors, namely platform users, platform corporations, algorithms and institutions. By considering the role of various actors, particularly institutions, and their interdependencies this paper contributes to more balanced conceptualizations of algorithmic imaginaries, which tend to be centered around users’ perspectives.

Author Biographies

Miloš Hroch, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Communication Studies and Journalism, Charles University

Miloš Hroch is an assistant professor at the Department of Media Studies at Charles University in Prague. His research interests are in the fields of participatory media studies, platform studies & cultural studies. In his monograph Vystřihni – nalep: Jak post-digitální tisk a ziny vzkřísily papírová média (2022), he (re)examines the materiality of zines in the post-digital situation.

Panos Kompatsiaris, IULM, Milan

Panos Kompatsiaris is an associate professor of cultural and media theory at HSE University and a research fellow in media sociology at IULM. He is the author of The Politics of Contemporary Art Biennials (2017) and several articles on art, theory, and cultural politics. His forthcoming book is titled Curation in the Age of Platform Capitalism: The Value of Selection, Narration, and Expertise in New Media Cultures (2024).

 

Volker Grassmuck , Leibniz Institute for Media Research Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI), Germany

Volker Grassmuck is a media sociologist, freelance author and activist. He has studied and conducted research on the knowledge order of digital media, copyright and the knowledge commons at Freie Universität Berlin, Tokyo University, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and University of São Paulo.

José Moreno, MediaLab CIES Iscte, Lisboa

José Moreno is a PhD candidate and Research Assistant at MediaLab CIEs ISCTE, a research center within the University Institute of Lisbon in Portugal. He was born in Portugal and joined academia after a professional career in journalism and his research interests include platformization of news, political polarization and disinformation.

Lutz Peschke, Universiteler Mah., Bilkent University Faculty of Fine Arts, Design and Architecture Department of Communication and Design, Ankara TUR

Lutz Peschke is an assistant professor at the Department of Communication and Design at Bilkent University in Ankara. He studied chemistry (PhD at the University of Heidelberg) and media studies (PhD at the University of Bonn). His research interests are among others digital cultures, science and knowledge communication, and environmental communication.

Jan Jirák, Department of Media Studies Institute of Communication Studies and Journalism Charles University, Prague

Jan Jirák is a professor at the Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University. He is a media scholar, teacher, translator, columnist, and head of the Department of Media Studies at Metropolitan University in Prague. His main fields of academic interest are media literacy and media education, the role of public service media, and media history.

 

Debashmita Poddar, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy

Debashmita Poddar is a Postdoctoral Fellow at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy, working as a social network researcher. She obtained her PhD in computer science, and her thesis focused on stochastic optimisation of networks.

References

AI Act (2023). European Parliament: Negotiating position on proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence, 14.06.2023, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0236_EN.html

Ang, I. (1985). Watching Dallas: Soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. Routledge.

Armano, E., Briziarelli, M., Flores, J., & Risi, E. (2022). Platforms, algorithms and subjectivities: Active combination and the extracting value process – An introductory essay. In E. Armano, M. Briziarelli & E. Risi (Eds.), Digital platforms and algorithmic subjectivities (pp. 1–18). University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/book54.a

Attebery, S. (2020). Fashion. In A. McFarlane, G. J. Murphy & L. Schmeink (Eds.), The Routledge companion to cyberpunk culture (pp. 228–237). Routledge.

Bennett, A. (1999). Subcultures or neo-tribes? Rethinking the relationship between youth, style and musical taste. Sociology, 33(3), 599–617. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42857964

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Prentice Hall.

Bratton, B. (2015). The stack: On software and sovereignty. MIT Press.

Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.) (2007). The Sage handbook of grounded theory. Sage Publications.

Bucher, T. (2018). If… then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.

Carpentier, N., Hroch, M., Cannizzaro, S., Miconi, A., & Doudaki, V. (2023). Bridging the discursive and material dimensions of europeanity and europeanisation: A participatory semantic map approach. Observatorio (OBS*), 17(1). https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS17120232251

Castoriadis, C. (1997). The imaginary institution of society. Polity Press.

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.

Charmaz, K. (2009). Shifting the grounds: Constructivist grounded theory methods. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Developing grounded theory: The second generation (pp. 127–193). Routledge.

Cellard, L. (2022). Algorithms as figures: Towards a post-digital ethnography of algorithmic contexts. New Media & Society, 24(4), 982–1000. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221079032

Cohen, I. J. (1989). Structuration theory. Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20255-3

Courtois, C., & Timmermans, E. (2018). Cracking the Tinder code: An experience sampling approach to the dynamics and impact of platform governing algorithms. Journal of Computer­‑Mediated Communication, 23(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmx001

Degeling, M., & Berendt, B. (2018). What is wrong about Robocops as consultants? A technology-centric critique of predictive policing. AI & SOCIETY, 33(3), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0730-7

DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. Continuum Press.

DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–147. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2635011

Digital Services Act (DSA) (2022). Regulation on a single market for digital services and amending directive 2000/31/EC (EU 2022/2065, 19.10.2022), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022R2065&qid=1666857835014

eCommerce Directive (2000). Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32000L0031

Ellis, C., Adams, T., & Bochner, A. (2010). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1589/3095

Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How hight­‑tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.

European Centre for Algorithmic Transparency. https://algorithmic-transparency.ec.europa.eu/index_en

Fisher, E. (2022). Algorithms and subjectivity: The subversion of critical knowledge. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003196563

Foster, C., & Zhang, R. (2022). Special Issue: Iteration and persuasion as key conditions of digital societies. AI & SOCIETY, 38(2), 1981–1986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01507-x

Freedman, G., & Reynolds, E. G. (1980). Enriching basal reader lessons with semantic webbing. The Reading Teacher, 33(6), 677–684. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20195100

Gandini, A., Gerosa, A., & Giuffrè, L. (2023). Subjectivity and algorithmic imaginaries: The algorithmic other. Subjectivity 30, 417–434. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-023-00171-w

Giddens, A. (1997). New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies (2nd revised edition). Polity Press. (Original work published in 1976)

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press.

Giddens, A. (1982). Profiles and critiques in social theory. Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86056-2

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2006). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction. (Original work published in 1967)

Gordon, T. (2009). Delphi. In J. C. Glenn & T. Gordon (Eds.), Futures research methodology — Version 3.0 (pp. 1–29). The Millennium Project.

Gorwa, R. (2019). What is platform governance? Information, Communication & Society, 22(6), 854–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573914

Gray­‑Hammond, D. (April 21, 2023). Reclaiming neurofuturism: Neuroqueering knowledge and its production. Emergent Divergence. https://emergentdivergence.com/2023/04/21/reclaiming-neurofuturism-neuroqueering-knowledge-and-its-production/

Greenhalgh, T., & Stones, R. (2010). Theorising big IT programmes in healthcare: Strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory. Social Science & Medicine, 70(9), 1285–1294. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.034

Griesbach, K., Reich, A., Elliott­‑Negri, L., & Milkman, R. (2019). Algorithmic control in platform food delivery work. Socius, 5. https://doi-org.ezproxy.is.cuni.cz/10.1177/2378023119870041

Harrison, J. (2023). Inscribed in code: Depictions of computational algorithms in twenty-first century fiction. Textual Practice, 37(12), 1875–1893. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2022.2148728

Higson, A. (2021). Netflix – The curation of taste and the business of diversification. Studia Humanistyczne AGH, 20(4), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.7494/human.2021.20.4.7

Inayatullah, S. (2012). Futures studies. Theories and methods. In F. G. Junquera (Ed.), There’s a Future: Visions for a Better World (pp. 37–65). BBVA.

Johnson, D.D., Pittelman, S.D. & Heimlich, J.E. (1986). Semantic mapping. The Reading Teacher, 39(8), 778–783.

Jones, M.R., & Karsten, H. (2008). Giddens’s structuration theory and information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 127–157. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148831

Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2018). The end of media logics? On algorithms and agency. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4653–4670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818779750

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor­‑network-theory. Oxford University Press.

Mathieu, D., Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P. (2020). The data loop of media and audience: How audiences and media actors make datafication work. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research, 36(69), 116–138. https://doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v36i69.121178

Mendonca, R. F., Almeida, V., & Filgueiras, F. (2023). Algorithmic institutionalism: The changing rules of social and political life. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192870070.001.0001

Mosco, V. (2004). The digital sublime: Myth, power, and cyberspace. MIT Press.

Napoli, P. M. (2014). Automated media: An institutional theory perspective on algorithmic media production and consumption. Communication Theory, 24(3), 340–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12039

Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.

Park, Y. J., Chung, J. E., & Shin, D. H. (2018). The structuration of digital ecosystem, privacy, and big data intelligence. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(10), 1319–1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218787863

Pan, S. Q., Vega, M., Vella, A. J., Archer, B. H., & Parlett, G. R. (1996). A mini-Delphi approach: An improvement on single round techniques. Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research, 2(1), 1–109.

Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.

Rose, J., Jones, M., & Truex, D. (2005). Socio­‑theoretic accounts of IS: The problem of agency. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 17(1), 133–152.

Rutz, H. (2016). Agency and algorithms. Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts, 8(1), 73–83.

Schulz, C. (2023). A new algorithmic imaginary. Media, Culture & Society, 45(3), 646–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221136014

Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests and identities (Fourth edition). Sage.

Sigfrids, A., Leikas, J., Salo­‑Pöntinen, H., & Koskimies, E. (2023). Human-centricity in AI governance: A systemic approach. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6, 976887. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.976887

Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.

Steinberg, M., & Li, J. (2017). Introduction: Regional platforms. Asiascape: Digital Asia, 4(3), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1163/22142312-12340076

Stones, R. (2017). Agency and Structure. In B.S. Turner (Ed.), The Wiley­‑Blackwell encyclopedia of social theory. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118430873.est0006

Stones, R. (2020). Anthony Giddens, Structuration theory, and radical politics. In P. Kivisto (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of social theory (pp. 395–421). Cambridge University Press.

Terranova, T. (2022). After the internet: Digital networks between capital and the common. Semiotext(e).

Törnberg, P. (2023). How platforms govern: Social regulation in digital capitalism. Big Data & Society, 10(1), 205395172311538. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231153808

Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2021). Outside the bubble: Social media and political participation in western democracies. Oxford University Press.

Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.

Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.

Van Dijck, J. (2020). Governing digital societies: Private platforms, public values. Computer Law & Security Review, 36, 105377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105377

Van Es, K., & Poell, T. (2020). Platform imaginaries and Dutch public service media. Social Media + Society 6(2), 1–10.

Webster, J. G. (2011). The duality of media: A structurational theory of public attention. Communication Theory, 21(1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01375.x

Whittington, R. (2015). Giddens, structuration theory and strategy as practice. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl & E. Vaara (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp. 145–164). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139681032.009

Ytre­‑Arne, B., & Moe, H. (2021). Folk theories of algorithms: Understanding digital irritation. Media, Culture & Society, 43(5), 807–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720972314

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile Books.

CEJC vol17 no1(35) Special Issue 2024 COVER

Downloads

Published

2024-07-04

How to Cite

Hroch, M., Kompatsiaris, P. ., Grassmuck , V., Moreno, J., Peschke, L., Jirák, J. ., & Poddar, D. (2024). Futures of algorithms and choices: Structuration of algorithmic imaginaries and digital platforms in Europe. Central European Journal of Communication, 17(1(35), 38-60. https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.17.1(35).707

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 1(35) (2024): Special Issue: The Construction of the Future of Platforms

Section

Scientific Papers

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Polish Communication Association

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.