Towards a Multi-Level Model of Resilience to Information Disorders

A Systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Dmytro Iarovyi Vytautas Magnus University
  • Ragne Kõuts-Klemm University of Tartu
  • Sten Torpan University of Tartu
  • Kristina Juraitė Juraitė

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.18.3(41).819

Keywords:

resilience, vulnerability, systematic literature review, disinformation, information disorder

Abstract

The article attempts, based on academic sources, to develop a systematic framework of the concepts that define resilience against information disorders – specifically, the factors of resilience and the social practices that support it. To achieve this, a domain-based systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted, drawing on an interdisciplinary selection of articles from peer-reviewed journals. The article describes and categorizes factors that either facilitate or undermine resilience against information disorders, organizing them into a three-dimensional model comprising macro-level, meso-level, and micro-level factors. The findings also emphasize existing academic achievements in recognizing the diverse approaches to enhancing resilience, some of which extend beyond the communication sphere. Given the growing challenges posed by disinformation and information manipulation, this review offers an evidence-based foundation for both theoretical exploration and practical interventions.

Author Biographies

Ragne Kõuts-Klemm, University of Tartu

Ragne Kõuts-Klemm is Associate Professor of Journalism Sociology at the Institute of Social Studies, University of Tartu. Her expertise lies in the analysis of social change and the role of the media in change. She has published on media systems and media use.

0000-0001-9277-6700

Sten Torpan, University of Tartu

Sten Torpan (MA) is a doctoral student in sociology at the University of Tartu, a junior researcher in crisis sociology, and a researcher of risk and crisis communication. He has studied societal myths, authoritarian ideologies, risk and crisis communication practices, as well as the harmful effects of misinformation and counter-practices. He has participated in several international research projects, primarily focusing on the study of European resilience and communication vulnerabilities of populations.

0000-0003-2052-092X

 

Kristina Juraitė, Juraitė

Kristina Juraitė is a professor and head of the Department of Public Communications at Vytautas Magnus University (VDU) in Kaunas, Lithuania. She is also a co-chair of the UNESCO Chair on Media and Information Literacy for Inclusive Knowledge Societies. Her research interests include media and information literacy, mediatization processes, media analysis, visual culture, and the transformation of post-Soviet societies and media.

0000-0002-7521-8560

References

Bjola, C., & Papadakis, K. (2021). Digital propaganda, counterpublics, and the disruption of the public sphere: The Finnish approach to building digital resilience. In The World Information War (pp. 186–213). Routledge.

Boulianne, S., Tenove, C., & Buffie, J. (2022). Complicating the resilience model: a four-country study about misinformation. Media and Communication, 10(3), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5346

Bourdieu, P. and Coleman, J. S. (Eds.). (1991). Social Theory for a Changing Society. Westview Press, Russell Sage Foundation.

Buzzanell, P. M. (2010). Resilience: Talking, resisting, and imagining new normalcies into being. Journal of Communication, 60(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01469.x

Dawson, A., & Innes, M. (2019). How Russia’s internet research agency built its disinformation campaign. The Political Quarterly, 90(2), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12690

Ferraz, T. V., & Helal, D. H. (2024). Informational resilience: a literature review. RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 22, e024009.

Golob, T., Makarovič, M., & Rek, M. (2021). Meta-reflexivity for resilience against disinformation. Comunicar, 29(66), 107–118. https://www.revistacomunicar.com/ojs/index.php/comunicar/article/view/C66-2021-09

Hall, P. A., & Lamont, M. (Eds.). (2013). Social resilience in the neoliberal era. Cambridge University Press.

HLEG (2018) A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation: report of the independent high-level group (HLEG) on fake news and online disinformation. European Commission. Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: https://blog.wan-ifra.org/sites/default/files/field_blog_entry_file/HLEGReportonFakeNewsandOnlineDisinformation.pdf

Humprecht, E., Esser, F., & Van Aelst, P. (2020). Resilience to online disinformation: A framework for cross-national comparative research. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(3), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219900126

Humprecht, E., Esser, F., Aelst, P. V., Staender, A., & Morosoli, S. (2023). The sharing of disinformation in cross-national comparison: Analyzing patterns of resilience. Information, Communication & Society, 26(7), 1342–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.2006744

Kapantai, E., Christopoulou, A., Berberidis, C., & Peristeras, V. (2021). A systematic literature review on disinformation: Toward a unified taxonomical framework. New Media & Society, 23(5), 1301–1326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820959296

Kõuts­‑Klemm, R., Rožukalne, A., & Jastramskis, D. (2022). Resilience of national media systems: Baltic media in the global network environment. Journal of Baltic Studies, 53(4), 543–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2022.2103162

Kozyreva, A., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2020). Citizens versus the internet: Confronting digital challenges with cognitive tools. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 21(3), 103–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620946707

Lazer, D. M., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., … & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094-1096. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aao2998

Liagusha, A., & Iarovyi, D. (2025). Memes, freedom, and resilience to information disorders: Information warfare between democracies and autocracies. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101247

Loecherbach, F., Moeller, J., Trilling, D., & van Atteveldt, W. (2020). The unified framework of media diversity: A systematic literature review. Digital Journalism, 8(5), 605–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1764374

Lorenz, D. F. (2013). The diversity of resilience: contributions from a social science perspective. Natural hazards, 67(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9654-y

Maclean, K., Ross, H., Cuthill, M., & Witt, B. (2017). Converging disciplinary understandings of social aspects of resilience. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(3), 519–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1162706

Meel, P. & Vishwakarma, D. (2019). Fake news, rumor, information pollution in social media and web: a contemporary survey of state-of-the-arts, challenges and opportunities. Expert Systems with Applications (153), 112986.

Mlejnková, P. (2022). Issues of resilience to cyber-enabled psychological and information operations. Vojenské rozhledy, 31(1), 38–50.

Moussa, M. B., Radwan, A. F., & Zaid, B. (2022). Resilience to Covid­‑Misinformation Among Youth in a Paternalistic Context: The Case of the UAE. American Communication Journal, 24(1).

Moya, J., & Goenechea, M. (2022). An approach to the unified conceptualization, definition, and characterization of social resilience. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5746. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5746

Obrist, B., Pfeiffer, C., & Henley, R. (2010). Multi-layered social resilience: A new approach in mitigation research. Progress in Development Studies, 10(4), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/146499340901000402

Pantazi, M., Hale, S., & Klein, O. (2021). Social and cognitive aspects of the vulnerability to political misinformation. Political Psychology, 42, 267–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12797

Parsons, T. (1968). On the concept of value-commitments. Sociological Inquiry, 38(2), 135–160.

Paul, J., & Barari, M. (2022). Meta-analysis and traditional systematic literature reviews—What, why, when, where, and how?. Psychology & Marketing, 39(6), 1099–1115. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21657

Ricard, J., Yañez, I., & Hora, L. (2025). A Framework for Information Disorder: Modeling Mechanisms and Implications Based on a Systematic Literature Review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.12537.

Rød, B., Pursiainen, C., & Eklund, N. (2025). Combatting Disinformation–How Do We Create Resilient Societies? Literature Review and Analytical Framework. European Journal for Security Research, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41125-025-00105-4

Romanova, T. A., Sokolov, N. I., & Kolotaev, Y. Y. (2020). Disinformation (fake news, propaganda) as a threat to resilience: approaches used in the EU and its member state Lithuania. Baltic region, 12(1), 53–67. https://balticregion.kantiana.ru/en/jour/4418/13008/

Roozenbeek, J., Van Der Linden, S., Goldberg, B., Rathje, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2022). Psychological inoculation improves resilience against misinformation on social media. Science advances, 8(34), eabo6254. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abo6254

Schneider, L. (1976). Classical Theories of Social Change. General Learning Press.

Shadmy, T. (2022). Content Traffic Regulation: A Democratic Framework for Addressing Misinformation. JURIMETRICS J., 63, 1–10.

Singh, S. R., Eghdami, M. R., & Singh, S. (2014). The concept of social vulnerability: A review from disasters perspectives. International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(6), 71–82.

Wardle, C. & Derakhshan, H. (2017) Information disorder: toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe report DGI 09, 31 October. Brussels: Council of Europe.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-17

How to Cite

Iarovyi, D., Kõuts-Klemm, R., Torpan, S., & Juraitė, K. (2026). Towards a Multi-Level Model of Resilience to Information Disorders: A Systematic Literature Review. Central European Journal of Communication, 18(3(41), 447-477. https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.18.3(41).819

Issue

Section

Scientific Papers