Green Shopping: Do Consumers Think About the Environment When Making Purchasing Decisions?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51480/compress.2022.5-2.471Keywords:
purchasing decision, the natural environment, green shopping, zero waste, ecologyAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is of find out how consumers consider eco-aspects when making purchases.
Design/methodology/approach: An internet survey of 713 respondents was conducted. The study uses the following statistical tests: Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient, Bivariate Pearson Correlation, Mann-Whitney U Test, Kruskal-Wallis Test, and Chi - Squared Test.
Findings. The people with children stand out with regard to shopping in a planned manner with a shopping list, which can help to make informed purchasing decisions and limit unnecessary shopping. The survey shows that people with children are willing to pay more to get a product in preferable packaging. However, the situation looks different when it comes to students. Students, compared with other professional status groups, are reluctant to pay more for better packaging. They also stand out in the case of social media use – they follow profiles promoting green behaviours.
Research limitations/implications. Further research is planned to study the motivation behind environmentally friendly purchasing decisions.
Practical implications. Among its findings the study demonstrates which groups could be potentially targeted with green product offers.
Social implications. The outcomes of the survey show how shopping and consumer preference is evolving. It is all-important to take care of the natural environment nowadays. For this reason, companies should strive to produce greener products to help consumers lower their environmental impact.
Originality/value. Drawing the correlation between a shopping process and consideration for the natural environment.
References
Amberg, N., & Fogarassy, C. (2019). Green consumer behavior in the cosmetics market. Resources, 8 (3), 137.
Basmann, R. L. (1956). A theory of demand with variable consumer preferences. Econometrica, Journal of the Econometric Society, 47–58.
Bradley, K. (2009). Planning for eco-friendly living in diverse societies. Local Environment, 14 (4), 347–363.
Brough, A. R., Wilkie, J. E. B., Ma, J., Isaac, M. S., & Gal, D. (2016). Is Eco-Friendly Unmanly? The Green-Feminine Stereotype and Its Effect on Sustainable Consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 43 (4), 567–582. Https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw044
Byrska, J. M. M. (2021). Dekonsumpcja—Droga do wyzwolenia z konsumpcjonizmu. Kultura i Wartości, 31, 23–41. Https://doi.org/10.17951/kw.2021.31.23-41
Cichocka, I., & Pieczonka, W. (2001). Ekokonsumpcja i niektore jej uwarunkowania wsrod mlodziezy szkolnej i akademickiej. Żywność Nauka Technologia Jakość, 08 (3), 108–125.
Engel, J. F., Kollat, D. T., & Blackwell, R. D. (1973). Consumer behavior. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Guath, M., Stikvoort, B., & Juslin, P. (2022). Nudging for eco-friendly online shopping – Attraction effect curbs price sensitivity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 81, 101821. Https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101821
Hermaniuk, T. (2018). Postawy i zachowania konsumentów na rynku ekologicznych produktów żywnościowych. Handel Wewnętrzny, 2 (373), 189–199.
Holdren, J. P., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1974). Human Population and the Global Environment: Population growth, rising per capita material consumption, and disruptive technologies have made civilization a global ecological force. American Scientist, 62 (3), 282–292.
Kauf, S., Tluczak, A., & Lysenko-Ryba, K. (2017). The effects of perceived CSR and ecological awareness on purchase decisions in Poland. Organizacja i Zarządzanie: kwartalnik naukowy.
Koreleska, E. (2017). Production and market of ecological product in Poland. International scientific conference RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2017, 1119–1123.
Kryk, B. (2011). Konsumpcja Zrównoważona a Proekologiczne Style Życia: A sustainable consumption vs. Ecological lifestyles. Studia i Materialy Polskiego Stowarzyszenia Zarzadzania Wiedza / Studies & Proceedings Polish Association for Knowledge Management, 51, 206–218.
Kwon, O.-H. (2011). Eco-friendly semiconductor technologies for healthy living. 2011 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, 22–28.
Mącik, R., & Mącik, D. (2015). Style podejmowania decyzji zakupowych konsumenta oraz ich pomiar. Studia Ekonomiczne / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach. Ekonomia, 2 (nr 236), 138–152.
Tobi, R. C., Harris, F., Rana, R., Brown, K. A., Quaife, M., & Green, R. (2019). Sustainable diet dimensions. Comparing consumer preference for nutrition, environmental and social responsibility food labelling: A systematic review. Sustainability, 11 (23), 6575.
Tobler, C., Visschers, V. H., & Siegrist, M. (2011). Eating green. Consumers’ willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors. Appetite, 57 (3), 674–682.
Toth, G., & Szigeti, C. (2016). The historical ecological footprint: From over-population to over-consumption. Ecological Indicators, 60, 283–291. Https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.040
Trudel, R. (2019). Sustainable consumer behavior. Consumer psychology review, 2 (1), 85–96.
Wasilik, K. (2014). Trendy w zachowaniach współczesnych konsumentów – konsumpcjonizm a konsumpcja zrównoważona. Konsumpcja i Rozwój, 1 (6), 66–74.
Wierzbiński, B., Surmacz, T., Kuźniar, W., & Witek, L. (2021). “The role of the ecological awareness and the influence on food preferences in shaping pro-ecological behavior of young consumers.” (“EconPapers: The Role of the Ecological Awareness and the Influence on …”) Agriculture, 11 (4), 345.
Witek, L. (2014). Typologia konsumentów na rynku produktów ekologicznych. Marketing i Zarządzanie, 35, 209–217.
Zalega, T. (2013). Nowe trendy i makrotrendy w zachowaniach konsumenckich gospodarstw domowych w XXI w. Konsumpcja i Rozwój, 2 (5), 3–21.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Polish Communication Association
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Content of the articles is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license