Cringe as a Form of Emotional Manipulation in Albanian Digital Campaigns (2025)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.19.2(43).1046Keywords:
Political awkwardness, Emotional manipulation, Digital political communication, Albanian elections, Platform politicsAbstract
Digital political campaigns increasingly use discomfort to hold the audience’s attention. Albania’s 2025 parliamentary elections illustrate this pattern. Cringe functions here as a form of emotional manipulation, drawing on theories of awkwardness, emotional governance, and political spectacle (Dahl, 2018; Deleuze, 1992; Debord, 1994). The Cringe Intensity Index (CII) measures this strategic awkwardness. The index was applied to campaign content from five political figures (N = 5) and 127,000 public comments collected during the official campaign period. Higher cringe intensity was associated with higher engagement (r = 0.79) and stronger electoral outcomes (ρ = 0.90). Campaign content built on false intimacy, symbolic dehumanization, exaggerated emotionality, and cultural misalignment was repeatedly amplified by platform algorithms. The method offers a replicable way to measure emotional manipulation in political communication. It also documents the growing role of emotional discomfort in platform-mediated politics.
References
Akter, S., & Fichman, P. (2025). Expressions of partisanship among young political supporters on TikTok in the United States. Social Media + Society, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251370914
AlAfnan, M. A. (2025). The role of memes in shaping political discourse on social media. Studies in Media and Communication, 13(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v13i2.7482
Baumgartner, J., & Morris, J. S. (2006). The Daily Show effect: Candidate evaluations, efficacy, and American youth. American Politics Research, 34(3), 341–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X05280074
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
BIRN. (2025, January 20). Albanian PM under fire over TikTok ban in election year. Balkan Insight. https://balkaninsight.com/2025/01/20/albanian-pm-under-fire-over-tiktok-ban-in-election-year/
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7313–7318. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618923114
Brusseau, J. (2020). Deleuze’s postscript on the societies of control updated for big data and predictive analytics. Theoria, 67(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2020.6716401
Cao, Y., Wei, Q., Gui, S., & Li, F. (2020). The temporal course of vicarious embarrassment: An electrophysiological study. Social Neuroscience, 15(4), 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2020.1754288
Chang, H.-C. H., & Fang, Y. S. (2024). The 2024 Taiwanese Presidential Election on social media: Identity, policy, and affective virality. PNAS Nexus, 3(4), pgae130. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae130
Dahl, M. (2018). Cringeworthy: A theory of awkwardness. Portfolio/Penguin.
Debord, G. (1994). The society of the spectacle. Zone Books.
Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3–7.
Forestal, J. (2024). Social media, social control, and the politics of public shaming. American Political Science Review, 118(4), 1704–1718. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423001053
Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.
Gray, J., Jones, J. P., & Thompson, E. (Eds.). (2009). Satire TV: Politics and comedy in the post-network era. NYU Press.
Heseltine, M., & Clemm von Hohenberg, B. (2024). Large language models as a substitute for human experts in annotating political text. Research & Politics, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680241236239
Huddy, L., Sears, D. O., & Levy, J. S. (Eds.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of political psychology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.001.0001
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
Keltner, D., & Buswell, B. N. (1997). Embarrassment: Its distinct form and appeasement functions. Psychological Bulletin, 122(3), 250–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.122.3.250
Kreiss, D., & McGregor, S. C. (2018). Technology firms shape political communication: The work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google with campaigns during the 2016 US presidential cycle. Political Communication, 35(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1364814
Licenji, L. (2026). The TikTok ban in Albania across the policy cycle: framing, legitimation, and rollback in mediated discourse. Frontiers in Communication, 11, Article 1847142. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2026.1847142
Mihăilescu, M. G. (2024). “Never mess with the ‘memers’”: How meme creators are redefining contemporary politics. Social Media + Society, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241296256
Milli, S., Carroll, M., Wang, Y., Pandey, S., Zhao, S., & Dragan, A. D. (2025). Engagement, user satisfaction, and the amplification of divisive content on social media. PNAS Nexus, 4(3), pgaf062. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf062
Molpeceres, A. V., Hernández, J. R., & Fernández, E. O. (2026). The spectacle of power: Hybridisation and digital populism in White House communication. Social Sciences, 15(3), Article 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15030186
NPR. (2024, December 23). Albanian prime minister says TikTok ban was not a rushed reaction. https://www.npr.org/2024/12/23/g-s1-39679/albania-prime-minister-tiktok-ban
Paulus, F. M., Müller‑Pinzler, L., Meshi, D., Peng, T.-Q., Martinez Mateo, M., & Krach, S. (2019). The politics of embarrassment: Considerations on how norm-transgressions of political representatives shape nation-wide communication of emotions on social media. Frontiers in Communication, 4, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00011
Piccardi, T., Saveski, M., Jia, C., Hancock, J., Tsai, J. L., & Bernstein, M. S. (2025). Reranking partisan animosity in algorithmic social media feeds alters affective polarization. Science, 390(6776), eadu5584. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adu5584
Reckien, D. (2018). What is in an index? Construction method, data metric, and weighting scheme determine the outcome of composite social vulnerability indices in New York City. Regional Environmental Change, 18(5), 1439–1451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1273-7
Solovev, K., Drolsbach, C., Demirel, E., & Pröllochs, N. (2026). Engagement with political videos on TikTok during the 2025 German federal election. EPJ Data Science, 15, Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-026-00632-7
Vučićević, D., & Atlagić, S. (2023). Electoral political communication in the post-communist hybrid regime: The case of Serbia 2020. Journal of Political Marketing, 22(3–4), 216–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2023.2221936
Yilmaz, I., Bliuc, A.-M., Norrie, R., Smith, C. M., Smith, J., Evans, C., Courtney, D. S., & Barnett, D. (2026). Populism in the age of social media: A systematic review of recent digital populism research. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448261420218
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Polish Communication Association
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
