The Politics of Golden Fries
Cringe Culture and Its Rise in Czech Political Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.19.2(43).1065Keywords:
Cringe culture, Political Communication, TikTok, Authenticity, Affective publicsAbstract
This study examines cringe political communication on Czech TikTok, asking how and why politicians fail to meet the platform’s demands for authenticity and cultural literacy. Combining digital ethnography with qualitative interpretive analysis, it applies a two-stage case selection procedure – purposive sampling validated against audience-response markers such as comments, ridicule, and derivative content – to 280 videos from 75 accounts of candidates in the 2025 Czech parliamentary elections. The analysis yields a five-category typology: Platform Tourism, Try‑Hard Authenticity, Gen Z Wannabe, Awkward Trend Attempts, and Performative Cringe Spectacle. Cringe is conceptualized not merely as communicative failure but as an analytical lens exposing structural tensions between platform-native cultural codes and institutional political authority, while transgressive performance can also work strategically as a source of visibility and relatability. Grounded in affect theory, the entertaining citizen paradigm, the personalization of politics, and platform studies, the study offers a systematic framework for analyzing political cringe.
References
Abidin, C. (2021). Mapping internet celebrity on TikTok: Exploring attention economies and visibility labours. Cultural Science Journal, 12(1), 77–103. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.140
Bailey, K. D. (1994). Typologies and Taxonomies: An Introduction to Classification Techniques. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986397
Bakhtin, M. (1984). Rabelais and his world. Indiana University Press.
Banet‑Weiser, S. (2012). Authentic: The politics of ambivalence in a brand culture. New York University Press.
Baumgartner, J., & Morris, J. S. (2006). The Daily Show effect: Candidate evaluations, efficacy, and American youth. American Politics Research, 34(3), 341–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X05280074
Bennett, W. L. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212451428
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
Brody, C. (2022). ‘Cringe’ content in a society of control. Pitt Sociology Review, Spring, 24–32.
Carlson, B., & Frazer, R. (2020). „They got filters“: Indigenous social media, the settler gaze, and a politics of hope. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120925261
Cervi, L., Tejedor, S., & Blesa, F. G. (2023). TikTok and political communication: The latest frontier of politainment? A case study. Media and Communication, 11(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6390
Clough, P. T., & Halley, J. (Eds.). (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822389606
Corner, J., & Pels, D. (Eds.) (2003). Media and the restyling of politics: Consumerism, celebrity and cynicism. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216804
Dahl, M. (2018). Cringeworthy: A theory of awkwardness. Penguin.
Dean, J. (2015). Affect and drive. In K. Hillis, S. Paasonen, & M. Petit (Eds.), Networked affect (pp. 89–100). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9715.001.0001
Driessens, O. (2013). Celebrity capital: Redefining celebrity using field theory. Theory and Society, 42(5), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-013-9202-3
Enli, G. (2015). Mediated authenticity: How the media constructs reality. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1458-8
Farkas, X., & Bene, M. (2021). Images, politicians, and social media: Patterns and effects of politicians‘ image-based political communication strategies on social media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(1), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220959553
Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2013). The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media & Society, 15(8), 1348–1365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812472322
Giuranno, M. G., & Manni, M. S. (2026). The impact of TikTok on elections: (Mis)information and regulatory challenges. Kyklos, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.70054
Goffman, E. (1956). Embarrassment and social organization. American Journal of Sociology, 62(3), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1086/222003
Hillis, K., Paasonen, S., & Petit, M. (Eds.). (2015). Networked affect. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9715.001.0001
Ibrahim, H., Jang, H. D., Aldahoul, N., Kaufman, A. R., Rahwan, T., & Zaki, Y. (2026). Systematic partisan content skews in TikTok during the 2024 US elections. Nature, 654(8120), 1004–1011. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10447-1
Jerslev, A. (2016). In the time of the microcelebrity: Celebrification and the YouTuber Zoella. International Journal of Communication, 10, 5233–5251.
Kluge, S. (2000). Empirically grounded construction of types and typologies in qualitative social research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.1.1124
Kreiss, D. (2016). Prototype politics: Technology-intensive campaigning and the data of democracy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199350247.001.0001
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. SAGE Publications.
Kruikemeier, S. (2014). How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.025
Marwick, A. E. (2013). Status update: Celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social media age. Yale University Press.
Massumi, B. (1995). The autonomy of affect. Cultural Critique, 31, 83–109. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354446
McAllister, I. (2007). The personalization of politics. In R. J. Dalton & H. D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior (pp. 571–588). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0030
Moffett, K. W., & Rice, L. L. (2024). TikTok and civic activity among young adults. Social Science Computer Review, 42(2), 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393231188470
Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford University Press.
Nelson, J. (2016). An unnecessary divorce: Integrating the study of affect and emotion in new media. Composition Forum, 34, 1–14.
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. SAGE Publications.
Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2019). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. SAGE Publications.
Průchová Hrůzová, A., & Zápotocký, J. (2022). Seemingly innocent pictures. Visual representations of migrants and refugees circulating through the Czech Facebook nationalistic universe. Visual Studies, 37(4), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2021.1953397
Sampson, T. D. (2012). Virality: Contagion theory in the age of networks. University of Minnesota Press.
Tsakona, V., & Popa, D. E. (Eds.). (2011). Studies in political humour: In between political critique and public entertainment. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.46
Van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2012). The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427802
van Zoonen, L. (2005). Entertaining the citizen: When politics and popular culture converge. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Veneti, A., Jackson, D., & Lilleker, D. G. (Eds.). (2019). Visual political communication. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18729-3
Zamora‑Medina, R., Suminas, A., & Fahmy, S. S. (2023). Securing the youth vote: A comparative analysis of digital persuasion on TikTok among political actors. Media and Communication, 11(2), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6348
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Polish Communication Association
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
